2020
DOI: 10.3390/ma13102330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Output of MEMS Piezoelectric Energy Harvester of Double-Clamped Beams with Different Width Shapes

Abstract: For a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) piezoelectric energy harvester consisting of double-clamped beams, the effects of both beam shape and electrode arrangement on the voltage outputs are analyzed. For two kinds of harvester structures including millimeter-scale and micro-scale, and different shapes including rectangular, segmentally trapezoidal and concave parabolic are taken into account. Corresponding electric outputs are calculated and tested. Their results are in good agreement with each other. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, the main contradiction is that the vibration source requires the device to match a lower resonance frequency. In addition, material optimization, substrate replacement, and geometry change are the main methods currently utilized for the optimization of harvesters [ 38 , 39 ]. However, to date, there have been limited systematic studies on cantilever beam structure-based PEHs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the main contradiction is that the vibration source requires the device to match a lower resonance frequency. In addition, material optimization, substrate replacement, and geometry change are the main methods currently utilized for the optimization of harvesters [ 38 , 39 ]. However, to date, there have been limited systematic studies on cantilever beam structure-based PEHs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, conventional silicon substrates are extremely vulnerable to damage due to their high modulus characteristics [22]. Therefore, material optimization, substrate replacement and geometry change are the main methods currently utilized for the optimization of harvesters [23][24][25][26][27]. Dong et al [23] proposed a dual-crystal PEH that was asymmetric from top to bottom and studied the effect of different coverage PZT lengths on device performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of geometric optimization, Nisanth et al [26] studied the performance of PEHs under different mass shapes. Compared with the PEH array with the traditional rectangular mass, the PEH array with the triangular mass increased the power output by 1.79 times at 0.5 g. Jin et al [27] studied the influence of different width beam shapes and electrode arrangements on the voltage output of harvesters, and verified through simulation and experimentation that the parabolic shape beam resulted in the best improvement in the performance of the devices. Differently shaped PEHs make the preparation and bonding of the proof masses difficult; however, the extension of linear PEHs will expand the options for device integration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang simulated and experimentally analyzed the array rectangular piezoelectric cantilever [ 19 ] and verified that the array piezoelectric cantilever could effectively increase the working frequency band. L. Jin investigated the output performance of a MEMS piezoelectric energy harvester under different width shapes [ 20 ]. In the research, the output performance of the harvester was tested by setting different cantilever structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%