2017
DOI: 10.1109/access.2017.2682422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Output Power Levels of 4G User Equipment and Implications on Realistic RF EMF Exposure Assessments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The constant c B in the path loss formula is chosen so as to obtain an average SNR of 3 dB for eMBB at the reference distance d B,R = d B for both UL and DL with transmission powers P B in the UL and P in the DL [47]. The constant c U is instead chosen so as to obtain an average URLLC SNR equal to 10 dB at the reference distance d U,R = d U for both UL and DL, with transmission powers P U = 23 dBm for both UL and DL [47]. Finally, unless stated otherwise, we assume throughout this section the values C = 2 bit/s/Hz, γ = 3, a U = 0.5 × 10 −3 and L U = 2 for H-OMA.…”
Section: A Simulations Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The constant c B in the path loss formula is chosen so as to obtain an average SNR of 3 dB for eMBB at the reference distance d B,R = d B for both UL and DL with transmission powers P B in the UL and P in the DL [47]. The constant c U is instead chosen so as to obtain an average URLLC SNR equal to 10 dB at the reference distance d U,R = d U for both UL and DL, with transmission powers P U = 23 dBm for both UL and DL [47]. Finally, unless stated otherwise, we assume throughout this section the values C = 2 bit/s/Hz, γ = 3, a U = 0.5 × 10 −3 and L U = 2 for H-OMA.…”
Section: A Simulations Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transitions between the states are expressed as service rates and arrival rates, which also depend on the radio conditions. However, the model strongly depends on the distribution of required TX-power, which can be obtained either by ray-tracing simulations or from empirical data, such as [9]. While CoPoMo is perfectly suited to provide power estimations in offline simulations, an online application is prevented in most cases by the lack of knowledge about the instant TX-power at higher protocol layers.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, we also included three distributions from [9], which reflect the TX-power distributions of different environments in Sweden. That data was obtained from a large set of base stations with the support of a mobile network operator [9]. Our measurements match the distribution for urban environments from the reference set, although our the trajectory also includes suburban and rural areas.…”
Section: A Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only a few studies have been conducted to assess LTE UE output power distributions under realistic exposure scenarios [9,10]. Moreover, authors found no studies of comparative UMTS and LTE analysis of UE power level distributions in everyday exposure situations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [9] authors present a series of uplink power measurements without targeting human exposure issues but rather for the purpose of deriving a power model of a commercial LTE network and comparing between 3G and LTE network power efficiency. Authors in [10] present result about power level distributions of 4G user equipment UE using data applications based on a very large number of samples collected over seven days in a LTE operating network. Their findings show that the mean output powers in all the environments was less than 1% of the maximum available output power and demonstrate once again that knowledge on realistic power levels is of crucial importance for accurate assessments of the radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure from mobile communication equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%