2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-2836-6_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Output Properties of Dual-Polarization IFOGs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In dual-polarization IFOGs, the intensity of the two orthogonal polarizations is summed up directly at the PD, which we refer it as to "optical compensation." Assuming the two polarization are incoherent, the PN errors at reciprocal and nonreciprocal ports can be expressed as [5], [30] (11) where p rx,ry , q rx,ry and p nr x,nry , q nr x,nry are listed in Table 2; d is the degree of depolarization (DOP) before entering the loop; note that d = 0 for well depolarized light. Furthermore, C r 1 (C nr 1 ) and C r 4 (C nr 4 ) are diagonal terms and C r 2 (C nr 2 ) and C r 3 (C nr 3 ) are off-diagonal terms of the transmission matrices for counter-propagating beams meeting at the reciprocal port (nonreciprocal port); these coefficients are complex numbers.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In dual-polarization IFOGs, the intensity of the two orthogonal polarizations is summed up directly at the PD, which we refer it as to "optical compensation." Assuming the two polarization are incoherent, the PN errors at reciprocal and nonreciprocal ports can be expressed as [5], [30] (11) where p rx,ry , q rx,ry and p nr x,nry , q nr x,nry are listed in Table 2; d is the degree of depolarization (DOP) before entering the loop; note that d = 0 for well depolarized light. Furthermore, C r 1 (C nr 1 ) and C r 4 (C nr 4 ) are diagonal terms and C r 2 (C nr 2 ) and C r 3 (C nr 3 ) are off-diagonal terms of the transmission matrices for counter-propagating beams meeting at the reciprocal port (nonreciprocal port); these coefficients are complex numbers.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%