2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10693-013-0174-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outside Director Stock Options and Dividend Policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
4
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In column 2 of Table 6, we estimated the relationship between ownership structure and dividend smoothing. In line with the study of Boumosleh and Cline (2015), Table 6 shows that Pakistani banks with high management ownership smooth less because of greater alignment, caused by high management ownership. Banks with low insider ownership have severe agency problems, hence they smooth more.…”
Section: Final Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In column 2 of Table 6, we estimated the relationship between ownership structure and dividend smoothing. In line with the study of Boumosleh and Cline (2015), Table 6 shows that Pakistani banks with high management ownership smooth less because of greater alignment, caused by high management ownership. Banks with low insider ownership have severe agency problems, hence they smooth more.…”
Section: Final Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Similarly, companies with director's stock options do not need an external mechanism for using dividends to reduce the agency conflict. This finding has been consistent for firms with excessive free cash (Boumosleh & Cline, 2015).…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Dividend payout also serves as mechanism of addressing agency related problems as a consequence of separation of ownership and control (Francis et al, 2011;Jiraporn, Kim and Kim, 2011). Agency theory suggested that dividend payment can reduce managers' likelihood of perquisite consumption and empire building due excess cash available in the firm (Jiraporn, Kim and Kim, 2011;Boumosleh and Cline, 2015). Therefore, it is relevant to factor out among others what influences decision to pay or not to pay dividends among firms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirically, previous evidence has shown that the size of a firm, its profitability and growth are among the leading factors that determine firms' propensity to pay dividends (Fama and French, 2001;DeAngelo, DeAngelo and Skinner, 2004;Fatemi and Bildik, 2012) and firms corporate governance (Francis et al, 2011;Jiraporn, Kim and Kim, 2011;Boumosleh and Cline, 2015). Regarding the board diversity for example, the relationship between female director and dividend policy is still an open question, only a handful studies attempted to examine this relationship using data from the US (Byoun, Chang and Kim, 2016) China (McGuinness, Lam and Vieito, 2015) Spain (Pucheta-Martínez and Bel-Oms, 2016) international study (Saeed and Sameer, 2017) and Nigeria (Idris, Ishak and Hassan, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature on outside director incentives mainly focuses on monetary rewards (e.g., Yermack 2004;Adams and Ferreira 2008;Boumosleh and Cline 2015), performance sensitivity of director compensation (e.g., Perry 1999;Yermack 2004) and reputation concerns (e.g., Fich and Shivdasani 2007;Fahlenbrach, Low and Stulz 2010). Counting the number of cases that led to outof-pocket liability of outside directors might serve as a good starting point but reveals little about incentives: a low number of cases, as documented by Black and Cheffins (2006), is equally consistent with strong incentive effects (supervisory board members chose high effort levels to avoid liability) and irrelevance (liability risks are practically nonexistent).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%