2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.indmarman.2019.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outside-in marketing: Why, when and how?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, it links novel technological developments with an old debate on art versus science in marketing (Brown, 2001). Axiom 4 suggests that empathy is a necessary precondition to obtain sufficient customer insights linking to the debate on outside‐in strategy (e.g., Rust, 2020a). While a partial understanding can be gained without empathy, full customer understanding is arguably not possible without empathy.…”
Section: Foundational Premises Of Empathy‐based Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As such, it links novel technological developments with an old debate on art versus science in marketing (Brown, 2001). Axiom 4 suggests that empathy is a necessary precondition to obtain sufficient customer insights linking to the debate on outside‐in strategy (e.g., Rust, 2020a). While a partial understanding can be gained without empathy, full customer understanding is arguably not possible without empathy.…”
Section: Foundational Premises Of Empathy‐based Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, an empathetic approach aimed at understanding customers is mirrored in popular concepts such as “customer intimacy” (e.g., Treacy & Wiersema, 1993), “customer knowledge competence” (e.g., Campell, 2003), and “customer insights” (e.g., Andersen & Ritter, 2008; Musarra & Morgan, 2020). One ongoing stream in the literature that is relevant to this issue is that of “outside‐in marketing” (e.g., Musarra & Morgan, 2020; Rust, 2020a), which can be condensed as being the marketing view of strategy, as opposed to the resource‐based view. Yet, even recent outside‐in marketing literature has emphasized the necessity of utilizing big data (e.g., Rust, 2020a), which arguably exacerbates the risk of missing out on obtaining a true empathetic understanding of the customer base (e.g., Ferràs‐Hernández, 2018; Huang et al, 2019; Malone, 2018; Rust & Huang, forthcoming).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the past decade, marketing has proposed new organizational perspectives for thriving in the presence of these forces. A significant theoretical development is the concept of the "outside-in" perspective of the firm, which has enjoyed increasing popularity in recent years (Day & Moorman, 2010;Hunt & Madhavaram, 2019;Moorman & Day, 2016;Mu, 2015;Mu, Bao, Sekhon, Qi, & Love, 2018;Musarra & Morgan, 2020;Quach, Thaichon, Lee, Weaven, & Palmatier, 2019;Rust, 2019). The outside-in perspective shifts managerial focus outside the traditional boundaries of the firm to facilitate understanding of external forces that may significantly influence firm performance and expand knowledge of how different participants inside and outside the firm interact to create value.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%