2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outside the box: Epistemic curiosity as a predictor of creative problem solving and creative performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
124
0
6

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 163 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(93 reference statements)
9
124
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…A wide variety of behavioral studies have suggested that NFC not only contributes to better task performance or problem solving but also shows a close correlation with creativity, such as divergent thinking, creative problem solving, and innovative behaviors in various creative tasks (Dollinger, 2003;Hahn & Lee, 2017;Hardy, Ness, & Mecca, 2017;Madrid & Patterson, 2016;Rostan, 2010;Watts et al, 2017;Wu, Parker, & de Jong, 2014). Higher NFC individuals are more likely to generate creative ideas in response to ambiguous or ill-defined problems, possibly because they are willing to devote more cognitive resources in the face of complexity and enjoy the process of thinking (Dollinger, 2003;Grass, Strobel, & Strobel, 2017;Watts et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A wide variety of behavioral studies have suggested that NFC not only contributes to better task performance or problem solving but also shows a close correlation with creativity, such as divergent thinking, creative problem solving, and innovative behaviors in various creative tasks (Dollinger, 2003;Hahn & Lee, 2017;Hardy, Ness, & Mecca, 2017;Madrid & Patterson, 2016;Rostan, 2010;Watts et al, 2017;Wu, Parker, & de Jong, 2014). Higher NFC individuals are more likely to generate creative ideas in response to ambiguous or ill-defined problems, possibly because they are willing to devote more cognitive resources in the face of complexity and enjoy the process of thinking (Dollinger, 2003;Grass, Strobel, & Strobel, 2017;Watts et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the information-processing theory, the problem-focused nature of D-type EC should prove more useful in the late stage of the creative process. That is, individuals with higher D-type EC will be more motivated to develop more ideas in terms of idea evaluation and the implementation stage of practical performance (Hardy III et al, 2017). However, Hardy III et al (2017) reported that D-type EC (i.e., curiosity associated with deprivation factors) was found to be unrelated to creative performance when solving a complex marketing problem.…”
Section: Relationship Between Epistemic Curiosity and Creative Performentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals with a high level of I-type EC curiosity are predisposed to seek out novelty because exposure to new information provides them with feelings of interest and excitement (Litman, 2005). Hardy III, Ness, and Mecca (2017) highlighted that this tendency "is well suited to early stage creative problem solving, which requires that individuals gather a wide range of information relevant to the problem that they can use in later stages of creative problem solving to generate and evaluate new ideas" (p. 231). Gajda, Beghetto, and Karwowski (in press) found more extended and exploratory interactions in the positive association classroom that would enhance the development or refinement of ideas.…”
Section: Relationship Between Epistemic Curiosity and Creative Performentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epistemic curiosity reflects the desire for knowledge, which motivates individuals to learn new ideas, close information gaps, and solve intellectual problems (Litman, 2008;Litman & Spielberger, 2003). It has been found to be positively related to EB, exploratory behaviour, complex problem-solving, and learning outcomes (e.g., Hardy, Ness, & Mecca, 2017;Litman, Hutchins, & Russon, 2005;Richter & Schmid, 2010). Although epistemic curiosity is considered a rather stable personality trait (e.g., Hardy et al, 2017), there is also evidence that it can be aroused by, for instance, participating in competitive hands-on activities in the domains of science and technology (Hong, Hwang, Szeto, Tai, & Tsai, 2016).…”
Section: Epistemic Curiositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been found to be positively related to EB, exploratory behaviour, complex problem-solving, and learning outcomes (e.g., Hardy, Ness, & Mecca, 2017;Litman, Hutchins, & Russon, 2005;Richter & Schmid, 2010). Although epistemic curiosity is considered a rather stable personality trait (e.g., Hardy et al, 2017), there is also evidence that it can be aroused by, for instance, participating in competitive hands-on activities in the domains of science and technology (Hong, Hwang, Szeto, Tai, & Tsai, 2016). Also, inquiry-based learning approaches have been described as potential ways to foster students' curiosity (Pluck & Johnson, 2011).…”
Section: Epistemic Curiositymentioning
confidence: 99%