Outsourced urban governance as a state rescaling strategy in Hyderabad, India

Abstract

In the years since liberalization, state power has been rescaled in India's polity and this is both a cause and consequence of greater interstate competition for footloose capital. In this context, some state governments are designing special regulatory tools to attract and concentrate investments by easing 'doing business' for private investors and leveraging land resources-primarily in their largest cities. Equally important, they ensure public investments are channelled to these select spaces and that resources are available for maintaining high standards of infrastructure. In Hyderabad, the 'Industrial Area Local Authority' (IALA) is a powerful tool that allows privatised management by state and nonstate actors of recently constructed productive spaces, mainly concentrating globalised service sector activities, including by collecting local tax revenues and various development charges to be spent exclusively within the industrial area. In this way, governance and fiscal functions are outsourced to non-elected bodies, outside the purview of democratic institutions. By essentially replacing municipal authorities, the IALA framework produces new forms of governance at the same time that it generates fragmentation of the institutional fabric of urban spaces. In effect, it creates a tool for bypassing urban politics, or in the case of periurban spaces does not allow an urban politics to emerge. Building on recent research, this paper examines the implications of IALAs in Hyderabad on urban governance and local state sovereignty.

Scripting Indian and Chinese urban spatial transformation: Adding new narratives to gentrification and suburbanisation research

“…Third, peri-urban developments in both India and China are associated with state rescaling (Kennedy, 2017; Kennedy and Sood, 2016, 2019; Williams et al., 2019; Wu, 2018; Wu and Phelps, 2011), flexible governance and informality (Gururani, 2013a; Roy, 2009) and mega urban projects (Follmann, 2015; Kennedy, 2017; Shen and Wu, 2017, 2020). The development of new towns, businesses and high-tech parks needs to be understood in their local contexts.…”

Overcoming Barriers to Urban Flood Resilience: A Case of Hyderabad, India

“…Fragmentary nature of process can be seen in master plans for the city. Surpassing the existing institutional structures and master plan for the city, new agencies like CDA were provided with special master plan with separate building rules, land use, and financial instruments [34]. This has only exacerbated the tendency to see the planning area in isolation from its broader socioecological context.…”

Actors and shifting scales of urban governance in India

“…Such enclaves incur costs to municipalities, e.g., to extend networked infrastructure to the zones, and also deprives them of tax revenue that could be used for under-serviced neighborhoods. 11 In Hyderabad, for instance, the state government created an ad hoc governance mechanism to administer designated areas in the city, including the new globally connected HITEC City and Nanakramguda Financial District (Kennedy and Sood 2019). Loosely modeled on business improvement districts, it effectively removes territory from the jurisdiction of the municipality; it empowers an unelected agency to collect and pool local taxes and building fees to be spent exclusively within the designated areas (ibid).…”