1992
DOI: 10.5465/ame.1992.4274298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Outsourcing and industrial decline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
218
0
9

Year Published

1997
1997
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 355 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
218
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Outsourcing can lead to hollowing out and an accompanying loss of competitive distinction (Bettis, Bradley, and Hamel, 1992;Chesbrough and Teece, 1996), a danger especially eminent in industries where little value is added by integration and assembly (Brusoni, Prencipe, and Pavitt, 2001). Outsourcing increases transaction costs (Williamson, 1975) in subtle, not so visible ways (Masten, 1993), due to the difficulty of monitoring behaviour of 1 It is an interesting paradox that supporters of outsourcing are often found within the camp of the inside-out view of firm strategy, which argues competitive advantage starts with core competences and firm resources inside the firm, while the opponents of outsourcing are those that use an outside-in approach, arguing competitive advantages arises from analysing the industry structure and positioning the firm in that industry.…”
Section: Outsourcing and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Outsourcing can lead to hollowing out and an accompanying loss of competitive distinction (Bettis, Bradley, and Hamel, 1992;Chesbrough and Teece, 1996), a danger especially eminent in industries where little value is added by integration and assembly (Brusoni, Prencipe, and Pavitt, 2001). Outsourcing increases transaction costs (Williamson, 1975) in subtle, not so visible ways (Masten, 1993), due to the difficulty of monitoring behaviour of 1 It is an interesting paradox that supporters of outsourcing are often found within the camp of the inside-out view of firm strategy, which argues competitive advantage starts with core competences and firm resources inside the firm, while the opponents of outsourcing are those that use an outside-in approach, arguing competitive advantages arises from analysing the industry structure and positioning the firm in that industry.…”
Section: Outsourcing and Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we include a categorical variable indicating the importance of new technology for the firms' products. Outsourcing activities may positively affect productivity (Bettis et al 1992; D'Aveni and Ravenscraft 1994; Lei and Hitt 1995;Quinn 1992). The entrepreneur will contract out those activities that are most time-consuming, of which (s)he has little experience or that do not belong to the core business.…”
Section: Sample and Variable Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could vary from components to sub-systems and even completed products (Bettis et al, 1992;Feenstra & Hanson, 1996). Scholars have also linked core competencies in relation to defining outsourcing has been brought in by Sharpe (1997), where it is looking at different suppliers for activities which doesn't fall in to a firm's core competence.…”
Section: Defining Outsourcing and Examining The Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%