Abstract:This paper considers the impact that information and communication technology (ICT) has on firms' choices over organisational form. In particular, the decision over whether to produce in-house or outsource services, and the decision over the location of activity. ICT reduces the transaction and adjustment costs of moving activity outside the firm, and of carrying it out at greater geographic distance. We find that more ICT-intensive firms purchase a greater amount of services on the market and they are more li… Show more
“…Outsourcing is also related to technology: it seems that there is a positive relation between KIBS outsourcing and investments in computer equipment and Information and Communication Technology (ICT). For instance, Abramovsky and Griffith (2006) find that ICT stimulates outsourcing by reducing the costs of moving activity outside the firms. Finally, ICT can be relevant to KIBS in other ways.…”
“…Outsourcing is also related to technology: it seems that there is a positive relation between KIBS outsourcing and investments in computer equipment and Information and Communication Technology (ICT). For instance, Abramovsky and Griffith (2006) find that ICT stimulates outsourcing by reducing the costs of moving activity outside the firms. Finally, ICT can be relevant to KIBS in other ways.…”
“…As shown in the empirical literature on ICT and growth, the firms that invest more in ICT and make complementary changes to their internal organization, as implied by the off-shoring of business activities previously performed in house, are more productive (Brynjolfsson and Hitt 2000;Bresnahan et al 2002;Bloom et al 2007). Moreover, Abramovsky and Griffith (2006) found that more ICT intensive firms purchased a greater amount of services in the market and they were more likely to purchase off-shore than less ICT intensive firms. Therefore ICT intensive firms should be better able to benefit from service off-shoring because of the way in which ICT eases business interactions (Brynjolfsson andHitt 2000, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The increasing role of offshoring has been favoured by the interplay between three factors: advances in technology, economic and competitive pressures to reduce costs and improve productivity, and institutional developments favouring trade liberalisation. In particular, the progress in Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) facilitated the tradability of services so that one of the most significant changes in economic activity over recent years has been the substantial growth of service off-shoring (Abramovsky and Griffith 2006;. So far, most of existing empirical evidence on the economic impact of international outsourcing has been primarily focused on its potentially negative effects on domestic employment (Feenstra and Hanson 1996;Olsen 2006;Blinder 2007).…”
We study the relation between service off--shoring and productivity growth in the manufacturing sector of a set of European economies in 1995--2005. We document that those countries resorting more to service off--shoring in 1995 experienced faster productivity growth in ICT/R&D intensive industries over the next decade. Our results show also that the productivity gap between more and less ICT/R&D intensive industries was relatively higher in those countries experimenting higher increases in service off--shoring intensity over the period. In both cases, ICT intensity is more relevant than R&D to explain the mechanism through which service off--shoring affects productivity growth. These findings are consistent with the enhancing productivity effects of the complementary relation between service off--shoring and ICT. JEL classification: O4, O3, F23
“…Abramovsky and Griffith () find that establishments using the Internet outsource approximately 10.6% more business services than those that do not in the UK, while Tomiura () shows evidence suggesting that firms connected with computer networks tend to outsource some of their manufacturing tasks in Japan.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the previous literature, we define “outsourcing” (“offshoring”) as the procurement of inputs via domestic outsourcing or foreign outsourcing (via foreign outsourcing or FDI). For example, Abramovsky and Griffith (, p. 595) define them as follows: “Outsourcing is the decision to make or buy, regardless of where the activity takes place. … Offshoring is about where the activity takes place, regardless of whether it is within the corporate boundary or outside it”.…”
This paper extends the Antràs and Helpman (2004) model to a continuum of sectors to explore a full set of possibilities for organizational forms in global sourcing. We show that industries of the economy are divided into seven classes of sectors in terms of the prevalence of organizational forms. In particular, the coexistence of different organizational forms is less likely as the sectoral input intensity is more extreme, so that intra‐industry heterogeneity is less relevant to the firms' organizational choices. It is also demonstrated that our equilibrium analysis offers a useful framework for examining comparative statics on the sectoral input intensity.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.