1995
DOI: 10.1200/jco.1995.13.3.783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ovarian cancer screening.

Abstract: Based on the literature, a large-scale long-term study that compares the mortality rates of a screened versus unscreened patient population is required before the efficacy of any screening method can be determined definitively.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a number of tumour markers have been identified (Bast et al, 1987;Berek and Bast, 1995;Mackey and Creasman, 1995;Chen and Karlan, 1998), a useful screening marker for ovarian cancer has not yet been clearly established. The most widely used marker, CA125, has shown merit in pilot screening studies and ovarian cancer management, but the sensitivity for early-stage disease before clinical detection remains questionable (Bast et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a number of tumour markers have been identified (Bast et al, 1987;Berek and Bast, 1995;Mackey and Creasman, 1995;Chen and Karlan, 1998), a useful screening marker for ovarian cancer has not yet been clearly established. The most widely used marker, CA125, has shown merit in pilot screening studies and ovarian cancer management, but the sensitivity for early-stage disease before clinical detection remains questionable (Bast et al, 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ovarian tumors, the downregulation of OVCA1 and OVCA2 (tumor suppressor genes present in normal ovary) is reported, while their functions in normal ovary are not well known [11,16]. In contrast, overexpression/amplification of certain oncogenes like C-MYC, RAS, AKT, EGFR (ErbB1 or HER1), HER2/neu (ErbB2), CSF1 C-MYC, etc., is also well known in ovarian tumors [3-5,11,14,17-20]. …”
Section: Ovarian Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…None of these methods alone achieves the required level of sensitivity. For example, CA 125 measurement detects only about 50% of stage 1 ovarian tumours 28. In the general population, clinical examination, transabdominal29 and transvaginal 30 31 ultrasonography, and serum CA 125 screening tests,32 either alone or in combination,33 have been assessed as potential screening tests in various settings.…”
Section: Feasibility Of Early Diagnosis or Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%