1992
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.159.1.1609728
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ovarian cysts are common in premenarchal girls: a sonographic study of 101 children 2-12 years old.

Abstract: Cysts were identified in 106 ovaries (68%). Cysts were seen in patients of all ages, particularly in the younger children (2-6 years old). Thirteen of the cysts, noted in 1 1 patients between 2 and 10 years old, were macrocysts.The typical sonographic appearance of the ovary in premenarchal girls is not homogeneous.Cysts are common in premenarchal girls between 2 and 12 years old and are the cause of the typical heterogeneous image. Macrocysts can be seen in healthy girls less than I I years old.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
19
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In 84% of the babies, follicles the diameters of which do not exceed 1 cm are found from the neonatal period to the age of 2 years. The same finding is observed with a rate of 68% in girls aged between 2 and 6 years (38). (2).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Mini Pubertysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In 84% of the babies, follicles the diameters of which do not exceed 1 cm are found from the neonatal period to the age of 2 years. The same finding is observed with a rate of 68% in girls aged between 2 and 6 years (38). (2).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Mini Pubertysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Upon US assessment, the ovaries were classified into 3 categories based on the observed structure [8][9][10][11][12][13]: (1) follicular (FO)-cysts or follicles measuring less than 10 mm in diameter, (2) homogeneous (HO)-absence of cysts or visible follicles, and (3) undetectable (UDO)-absence of a detectable ovarian structure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former allowed the examination of the patients' external genitals to exclude inflammations/infections of the vulva or the urethra and the assessment of integrity and patency of the hymen. Pelvic US allowed the examination of the internal genitals to search for malformations and neoplastic pathologies affecting these organs [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%