2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ovarian Reserve Following Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy vs Cyst Deroofing for Endometriomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower rates of spontaneous pregnancy and higher rates of recurrence are associated with ablative surgery compared with cystectomy, whereas cystectomy was found to be deleterious for residual ovarian function (162,379,380). Since the meta-analysis of Dan et al in 2013 (380), RCTs comparing ablative versus excisional techniques in terms of ovarian reserve markers and ovarian residual volume have been performed (381)(382)(383)(384)(385)(386). Data from animal studies (387) and RCT (381,382,388) on the use of laser and plasma energy is encouraging and may result in less inadvertent tissue removal and thermal injury compared with cystectomy and bipolar electrosurgery.…”
Section: Fertility Sparing Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower rates of spontaneous pregnancy and higher rates of recurrence are associated with ablative surgery compared with cystectomy, whereas cystectomy was found to be deleterious for residual ovarian function (162,379,380). Since the meta-analysis of Dan et al in 2013 (380), RCTs comparing ablative versus excisional techniques in terms of ovarian reserve markers and ovarian residual volume have been performed (381)(382)(383)(384)(385)(386). Data from animal studies (387) and RCT (381,382,388) on the use of laser and plasma energy is encouraging and may result in less inadvertent tissue removal and thermal injury compared with cystectomy and bipolar electrosurgery.…”
Section: Fertility Sparing Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding suggests that the vasopressin injection procedure was more successful in preventing ovarian reserve damage. The main causes of the deterioration in ovarian reserve are thought to be the loss of healthy ovarian tissue and the destruction of ovarian tissue brought on using bipolar coagulation [9] . Several authors have suggested suturing just the ovary to prevent electrocoagulation damage [10,11] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several strategies have been reported to prevent ovarian reserve decline after laparoscopic ovarian surgery, including different surgical techniques, chemical agents, and medications [ 32 34 ]. Ovarian cystectomy reduced ovarian reserve after surgery more than ovarian ablation (or vaporization) and deroofing; however, cyst recurrence was found more often in patients treated with ovarian ablation and deroofing than cystectomy [ 26 , 35 ]. A systematic review involving 1047 patients demonstrated that laparoscopic ovarian suture preserved ovarian function more than bipolar electrosurgery did.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%