Over half of badminton players suffer from shoulder pain: Is impingement to blame?

Arora, Manit; Shetty, Sunil; Khedekar, Ravindra G.; Kale, Sachin

doi:10.1016/j.jajs.2014.12.006

Cited by 23 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Mechanistically, an increased force load to the knee from a rapid change in eccentric/concentric contractions of the quadriceps at varying degrees of knee flexion and rotation [6,30], single-leg landing after an overhead shot, and planting and cutting during a side-step [25] could contribute to such injuries. As for the upper limb, the shoulder was found to be the most commonly injured body region in line with other studies [6,7,26], which could be associated with repeated exposure to high force and increased stress during hitting motions [31]. Unique to this study, the most common diagnosis of shoulder injury was rotator cuff strain, compared to rotator cuff tendinopathy in Shariff et al (2009) [6].…”

Section: Patterns Of Injury; Age Sex Site Occasion and Naturesupporting

confidence: 85%

Prevalence, patterns and factors associated with injury: comparison between elite Malaysian able-bodied and para-badminton players

Zulfikri

Selvanayagam

Hamid

et al. 2021

The Physician and Sportsmedicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives: This study aimed to determine and compare the prevalence, patterns and factors associated with injury between elite Malaysian able-bodied and para-badminton players. Methods: Medical records from July 2007 to December 2017 were reviewed. Results: Among 209 able-bodied players, 1010 injuries were reported. The injuries affected the lower limb (67.2%), sustained during training (94.2%), overuse in nature (38.7%), and involving mostly junior players (62.4%). The injury rate was 94/year, lower than previously reported. Patellar tendinopathy and muscle strain to the upper limb and torso were the commonest. Age, sex and history of injury were predictors of injury. Lower limb injury was a predictor of upper limb and torso injuries, while history of injury to the upper limb and/or torso was a predictor of lower limb injury. Meanwhile, among 18 parabadminton players, 62 injuries were reported from July 2014 to December 2017, which involved the lower limb (45.2%), sustained during training (87.1%), overuse in nature (54.8%), and involved mostly standing-class players (77.8%). The injury rate was 10/year. Patellar tendinopathy, rotator cuff tendinopathy and back muscle strain were the commonest. The patterns of injury (site, occasion and nature) were similar between groups, except for the shoulder where nature was overuse in para-badminton players compared to acute in able-bodied players. Conclusions: All players are susceptible to training-related injuries, particularly to the lower limb. Over the last decade, an increase in the injury index for the lower limb and a shift from chronic to acute for the upper limb were observed among able-bodied players. Age, sex and history of injury expose ablebodied players to greater risk. Meanwhile, for para-badminton players, overuse shoulder and knee injuries are commonest. These findings necessitate a comprehensive injury prevention program that encompasses all body regions with an emphasis on the lower limb among elite Malaysian able-bodied and para-badminton players.

show abstract

Section: Patterns Of Injury; Age Sex Site Occasion and Naturesupporting

confidence: 85%

Prevalence, patterns and factors associated with injury: comparison between elite Malaysian able-bodied and para-badminton players

Zulfikri

Selvanayagam

Hamid

et al. 2021

The Physician and Sportsmedicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For injury incidence rate per 1000 h of shoulder injuries, 0.30 injuries per 1000 h in badminton players, including 0.33 in elite senior badminton players, 0.50 in elite junior badminton players and 0.12 in potential badminton players. Shoulder pain was caused by subacromial impingement, instability or scapulothoracic dyskinesia 4 that approximately 27.0–52.6% of badminton players experienced shoulder pain 2 , 5 , 6 . Shoulder pain would change overhead motion performance negatively and affect activities of daily living such as sleeping disturbance 7 , 8 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Epidemiology and pain in elementary school-aged players: a survey of Japanese badminton players participating in the national tournament

Zhou

Imai

Liu

et al. 2021

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Pain is common in athletes which should be well managed. To identify risk factors for shoulder pain, and the association between shoulder pain, lower back pain and knee pain among elementary school-aged badminton players, we conducted a cross-sectional study to collect data of the past year among 611 elementary school age (7–12 years old) badminton players belonging to the Japan Schoolchildren Badminton Federation using a questionnaire. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated by multivariate logistic regression analysis. The overall incidence rate of shoulder injuries, lower back injuries and knee injuries was 0.38 injuries per 1000 h of badminton training. Players with training time per day > 2.5 h were 2.64 times (95% CI 1.03–6.78, p = 0.043) more likely to sustain shoulder pain than those with training time per day ≤ 2.5 h. A significant association was revealed between shoulder pain and knee pain as well as between lower back pain and knee pain as training hours per day > 2.5 h. Moreover, lower back pain was significantly associated with shoulder pain independent of training hours per day (≤ 2.5 h: p = 0.001; > 2.5 h: p < 0.001). These findings indicate that training time per day is risk factor, and shoulder pain, lower back pain and knee pain were associated with each other in elementary school-aged badminton players.

show abstract

“…The coupling angle showed that hip movement relative to rear foot movement was greater than knee movement relative to rear foot movement (p < 0.001). Badminton, as a non-contact sport, has been widely loved by people [10], but it has strong antagonism and high intensity [11]. With "fast" as the core, badminton is easy to cause sports injury [12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Study on Biomechanics of Two Legs in the Action of Single-Leg Landing in Men’s Badminton

He¹

2022

Molecular &Amp; Cellular Biomechanics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to analyze the biomechanical difference between the two legs of male badminton players when they land on one leg, thereby providing some guidance for preventing sports injury. Ten male badminton players were selected as the subjects. They did the single-leg landing movement successfully three times. The kinematic data were obtained by the Vicon infrared high-speed motion capture system. The kinetic data were obtained by the KISTLER three-dimensional forcing measuring platform. The data were processed and analyzed. The center of gravity of the right leg on the X and Y axes were 0.25 ± 0.05 and 0.21 ± 0.04 m, respectively, which were lower than that of the left leg (p < 0.05). At the moment of landing by a single leg, the hip angle of the left and right legs was 164.78 ± 6.12°and 156.29 ± 6.89°, respectively (p < 0.05), the hip joint speed of the left and right legs was 2.21 ± 0.32 and 1.98 ± 0.31 m/s, respectively (p < 0.05), the knee joint speed of the left and right legs was 2.51 ± 0.21 and 2.21 ± 0.21 m/s, respectively (p < 0.05). Although there was no significant difference in the range of joint motion, the motion range of the right leg was larger than that of the left leg, and the buffering time of the knee joint of the right leg was also significantly less than that of the left leg. The comparison of the kinetic data demonstrated that the ground reaction force (GRF), peak vertical ground reaction force (PVGRF), and lower limb stiffness of the right leg were significantly smaller than those of the left leg, and the time to peak force was greater than that of the left leg (p < 0.05). The injury risk of the left leg is greater than that of the right leg when the athlete land on a single leg. In the process of training, the athlete should strengthen the stability training of two legs, especially the left leg, in order to reduce sports injury.

show abstract

Over half of badminton players suffer from shoulder pain: Is impingement to blame?

Cited by 23 publications

References 23 publications

Prevalence, patterns and factors associated with injury: comparison between elite Malaysian able-bodied and para-badminton players

Prevalence, patterns and factors associated with injury: comparison between elite Malaysian able-bodied and para-badminton players

Epidemiology and pain in elementary school-aged players: a survey of Japanese badminton players participating in the national tournament

Comparative Study on Biomechanics of Two Legs in the Action of Single-Leg Landing in Men’s Badminton

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About