Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE National Radar Conference
DOI: 10.1109/nrc.1997.588315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Over-the-horizon radar sensitivity enhancement by impulsive noise excision

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let . The waveform is sampled at time intervals , giving the discrete signal as (6) which is the product of two complex sinusoids in pulse index and sample index , combined with the additive noise . The phase changes over within one pulse provide slant range information while the phase changes over from pulse to pulse give Doppler information.…”
Section: Signal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Let . The waveform is sampled at time intervals , giving the discrete signal as (6) which is the product of two complex sinusoids in pulse index and sample index , combined with the additive noise . The phase changes over within one pulse provide slant range information while the phase changes over from pulse to pulse give Doppler information.…”
Section: Signal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various signal processing methods have been considered for the suppression of impulsive and transient interference signals for enhanced OTHR performance (see for example [6]- [10]). However, to our knowledge, signal detection and cross-radar interference mitigation in a dual-radar OTHR system was not considered until [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HF radar signal is usually contaminated by strong transient interference, such as impulsive lightning and meteor echoes. Filtering out the interference in the time domain is possible [2], but it results in missing pulse bursts. Transmitting the SFW and excising the transient interference results in signal deficiency in 2D, simultaneously in the frequency domain and time domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the IMI brings broadband noise with high-amplitude into the entire range of Doppler search space, significantly limiting the target detection performance of the OTHR. Typical external IMI can be either natural or man-made, including the echo of meteor trail from the universe [9][10][11], the air lightning [12], the shortwave radio communication electromagnetic wave interference [8] and etc. The IMI-s are usually 20-40 dB stronger than the thermal noise at the receiver [14], where the former brings the dominant impact on OTHR performance over the latter and the attentions are usually paid to the former.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The IMI-s are usually 20-40 dB stronger than the thermal noise at the receiver [14], where the former brings the dominant impact on OTHR performance over the latter and the attentions are usually paid to the former. The impact arising from external IMI reduces the radar sensitivity on the order of 10 dB, making it unacceptable for the OTHR to track small aircrafts [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%