2020
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30074-7
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer receiving matched therapies following molecular profiling: a retrospective analysis of the Know Your Tumor registry trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
329
0
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 393 publications
(341 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
8
329
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, results of the TAPUR trial (NCT02693535), reported at this year's ASCO meeting, show that olaparib monotherapy had significant antitumor activity in heavily pretreated pancreatic cancer patients with germline (disease control in 5/12 patients) or somatic (disease control in 3/16 patients) BRCA1/2-inactivating mutations [28]. These findings are in agreement with results from a retrospective analysis of the Know Your Tumor (KYT) registry trial [29], which found that patients with pancreatic cancer whose tumors harbor targetable molecular alterations, like BRCA1/2 mutations, and who received molecularly matched therapy had a significantly longer median OS than similar patients who did not receive molecularly matched therapy.…”
Section: Targeted Therapysupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, results of the TAPUR trial (NCT02693535), reported at this year's ASCO meeting, show that olaparib monotherapy had significant antitumor activity in heavily pretreated pancreatic cancer patients with germline (disease control in 5/12 patients) or somatic (disease control in 3/16 patients) BRCA1/2-inactivating mutations [28]. These findings are in agreement with results from a retrospective analysis of the Know Your Tumor (KYT) registry trial [29], which found that patients with pancreatic cancer whose tumors harbor targetable molecular alterations, like BRCA1/2 mutations, and who received molecularly matched therapy had a significantly longer median OS than similar patients who did not receive molecularly matched therapy.…”
Section: Targeted Therapysupporting
confidence: 74%
“…As seen in the case of BRCA mutations which convey susceptibility towards PARP inhibitors, genetic screening prior to treatment allows for the identification of distinct patient populations and more precise therapy. Pishvaian et al [29] showed that the median OS of patients with advanced PDAC harboring targetable genetic alterations and receiving matched therapy is 1 year longer than of those with actionable alterations receiving unmatched therapy, or those without targetable alterations. No other therapeutic modality had an impact of this magnitude, showing that molecular profiling together with matched targeted therapy is clearly the most promising clinical directive.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differently from conventional PDAC, if appropriately selected based on their individual genomic and molecular features, these special PDAC subtypes can be treated with specific therapeutic strategies (see Table 1 for a list of selected ongoing trials with agents targeting molecular aberrations that are enriched in KRAS wild type PDAC), representing an important step towards the establishment of precision oncology for patients with pancreatic cancer [ 71 ]. As exemplified by the recently reported “Know Your Tumor” initiative experience in PDAC [ 72 ], only a minority of patients might currently benefit from extended molecular profiling (46 out of 1223–4% - profiled patients received matched therapy in their experience). That said, the evidences reviewed and discussed on these topics may call for a complementation of PDAC histological diagnosis with routine determination of KRAS mutational status, followed by comprehensive molecular profiling of KRAS wild-type cases.…”
Section: Clinical Considerations and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pancreatic cancer continues to have a poor 5-year survival rate despite its rising incidence [20,21]. By 2030, it is estimated to become the second leading cause of cancer related deaths [5].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%