2020
DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2020.00061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overall Survival Prediction in Glioblastoma With Radiomic Features Using Machine Learning

Abstract: Glioblastoma is a WHO grade IV brain tumor, which leads to poor overall survival (OS) of patients. For precise surgical and treatment planning, OS prediction of glioblastoma (GBM) patients is highly desired by clinicians and oncologists. Radiomic research attempts at predicting disease prognosis, thus providing beneficial information for personalized treatment from a variety of imaging features extracted from multiple MR images. In this study, first-order, intensity-based volume and shape-based and textural ra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
74
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
74
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Wijethilake et al (37) evaluated the influence of radiomics with different ML algorithms, and their results varied between 40% and 53%. Similarly, Baid et al (38) used multi-layer perceptron (MLP) on radiomic features and the accuracy and p value of the algorithm were 0.571 and 0,427 respectively. Such results show that radiomic features are not promising enough in patients' OS prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wijethilake et al (37) evaluated the influence of radiomics with different ML algorithms, and their results varied between 40% and 53%. Similarly, Baid et al (38) used multi-layer perceptron (MLP) on radiomic features and the accuracy and p value of the algorithm were 0.571 and 0,427 respectively. Such results show that radiomic features are not promising enough in patients' OS prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, radiomics and the application of machine learning/artificial intelligence to diagnostic MRI scans has the potential to identify early tumor recurrence/progression, distinguish pseudoprogression from progression (42,43) as well as to identify imaging signatures that are relatively specific to molecular subgroups of the more common diagnoses in adults (GBM, oligodendroglial tumors, low grade gliomas) (44,45) and children (low grade gliomas, medulloblastoma, ependymoma, diffuse midline gliomas) (46,47). While several techniques have been described, none have achieved widespread clinical acceptance for routine use.…”
Section: Neuroimaging and Neurosurgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been multiple attempts to provide individualized predictions for survival (Baid, Rane, et al, 2020), progression (Kumar, Verma, Arora, et al, 2017), and response prediction (Johannet et al, 2021; Kim et al, 2018) many of which cross boundaries set by traditional risk stratification (Lu et al, 2017) using deep learning based approaches on radiology and pathology images. Coupled with the ability to reflect, predict and model genomic mutations (Coudray et al, 2017; Mahajan et al, 2020; Wang et al, 2019; Zhao et al, 2019), protein expression (Anand et al, 2020), tumor markers (Scagliotti et al, 2012) as well as intratumoral heterogeneity (Jaber et al, 2020; Kumar, Zhao, et al, 2019; Truong, Sharmanska, Limbӓck‐Stanic, & Grech‐Sollars, 2020) in tumors, image‐based DL methods have made it feasible to converge these divergent multimodal approaches into a single workflow (Romo‐Bucheli et al, 2017).…”
Section: Successes Of Deep Learning In Cancer Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%