1985
DOI: 10.1007/bf02167684
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overbite-Korrelationen zwischen dentalen und skelettalen Faktoren des Gesichtsschädels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
0
2
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
0
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to Ülgen's results, [30] we demonstrate a better correlation between dental and vertical relationships. For instance, the correlation coefficient between overbite and the ML-NSL angle in our study was estimated to lie at -0.74, but a correlation coefficient only of -0.31 was described in non-selected patient groups [30].…”
Section: Dental Relationcontrasting
confidence: 56%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast to Ülgen's results, [30] we demonstrate a better correlation between dental and vertical relationships. For instance, the correlation coefficient between overbite and the ML-NSL angle in our study was estimated to lie at -0.74, but a correlation coefficient only of -0.31 was described in non-selected patient groups [30].…”
Section: Dental Relationcontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Using Pearson's correlation coefficient, we also noted strong interrelationships between overbite and the standard vertical parameters, the DFA according to Sato [21], and the ODI described by Kim [15]. In contrast to Ülgen's results, [30] we demonstrate a better correlation between dental and vertical relationships. For instance, the correlation coefficient between overbite and the ML-NSL angle in our study was estimated to lie at -0.74, but a correlation coefficient only of -0.31 was described in non-selected patient groups [30].…”
Section: Dental Relationcontrasting
confidence: 48%
See 2 more Smart Citations