2017
DOI: 10.20339/am.09-17.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overcome stagnation of university education: from bureaucratic control to competition of quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The administrative and bureaucratic management systems formulated in modern universities have been a disputed question in the aspect of high education problems' peculiarities [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. This situation presents a natural reflection of the social processes' reality characterized by the fact that "academic managerialism and bureaucratization of higher education served as prerequisites for the transformation of managers into a key university community, often opposing two main ones -students and teachers" [2] p. 5235.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The administrative and bureaucratic management systems formulated in modern universities have been a disputed question in the aspect of high education problems' peculiarities [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. This situation presents a natural reflection of the social processes' reality characterized by the fact that "academic managerialism and bureaucratization of higher education served as prerequisites for the transformation of managers into a key university community, often opposing two main ones -students and teachers" [2] p. 5235.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The answer to it is often sought in references to the effectiveness of bureaucratic management, justified by the researcher M. Weber. But, if the bureaucracy in universities optimizes the management process then why do the results of such optimization still seem very doubtful to many specialists [5,8,9,13,19] ?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%