2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-49409-8_33
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overcoming Calibration Problems in Pattern Labeling with Pairwise Ratings: Application to Personality Traits

Abstract: We address the problem of calibration of workers whose task is to label patterns with continuous variables, which arises for instance in labeling images of videos of humans with continuous traits. Worker bias is particularly difficult to evaluate and correct when many workers contribute just a few labels, a situation arising typically when labeling is crowd-sourced. In the scenario of labeling short videos of people facing a camera with personality traits, we evaluate the feasibility of the pairwise ranking me… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The feasibility of the challenge annotations was successfully evaluated prior to the start of the challenge. The reconstruction accuracy of all annotations obtained by the BTL model was greater than 0.65 (test accuracy of cardinal rating reconstruction by the model [15]). Furthermore, the apparent trait annotations were highly predictive of invite-for-interview annotations, with a significantly above-chance coefficient of determination of 0.91.…”
Section: Data Annotationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The feasibility of the challenge annotations was successfully evaluated prior to the start of the challenge. The reconstruction accuracy of all annotations obtained by the BTL model was greater than 0.65 (test accuracy of cardinal rating reconstruction by the model [15]). Furthermore, the apparent trait annotations were highly predictive of invite-for-interview annotations, with a significantly above-chance coefficient of determination of 0.91.…”
Section: Data Annotationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) was used for generating the labels. A principled procedure was adopted to guarantee the reliability of labels, converting rankings provided by labelers into normalized real valued scores (see [45] for details). The considered personality traits Fig.…”
Section: B Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to labeling the apparent personality traits, AMT workers labeled each video with a variable indicating whether the person should be invited or not to a job interview (the "job-interview variable"). This variable was also subject to the post processing reported in [45], so the variable to be predicted is a real number. The reader is referred to [18] where the data set is described in more details.…”
Section: B Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Amazon Mechanical Turk (AMT) was used for collecting the data to generate these labels. In order to guarantee the reliability of the labels, all rankings provided by the AMT workers were converted into normalized real valued scores using a principled procedure (see [1] for details). Personality traits that were used in the dataset were those from the Five Factor Model (also known as the Big Five).…”
Section: The First Impressions Data Setmentioning
confidence: 99%