2023
DOI: 10.1111/lang.12576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overcoming Challenges to Open Research Practices – A Perspective From the Global South: A Commentary on “(Why) Are Open Research Practices the Future for the Study of Language Learning?”

Abstract: In the last few years, open research practices have grown in interest and uptake in many scientific domains. Vincente-Saez and Martinez-Fuentes ( 2018) saw open research as irreversible, impacting all scientific activities and processes. The benefits of open research are being explored and established through the support of researchers, research institutions, and international organizations. In language research, and the study of language learning in particular, open research practices involve making research … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As reviewed earlier, many leading journals in the field adopt the hybrid OA model with costly APCs. This financial impediment, often referred to as the "pay-to-say" barrier (Šimukovič, 2018;Piron, 2018), places scholars from under-resourced backgrounds or institutions at a particular disadvantage (Chiware & Skelly, 2023). Granted, there have been some initiatives aiming to alleviate such inequities.…”
Section: Open Manuscripts: Inequitable Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reviewed earlier, many leading journals in the field adopt the hybrid OA model with costly APCs. This financial impediment, often referred to as the "pay-to-say" barrier (Šimukovič, 2018;Piron, 2018), places scholars from under-resourced backgrounds or institutions at a particular disadvantage (Chiware & Skelly, 2023). Granted, there have been some initiatives aiming to alleviate such inequities.…”
Section: Open Manuscripts: Inequitable Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%