2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overcoming cisplatin resistance of ovarian cancer cells by targeting HIF-1-regulated cancer metabolism

Abstract: Cisplatin is currently one of the most effective chemotherapeutic drugs used for treating ovarian cancer; however, resistance to cisplatin is common. In this study, we explored an experimental strategy for overcoming cisplatin resistance of human ovarian cancer from the new perspective of cancer cell metabolism. By using two pairs of genetically matched cisplatin-sensitive and cisplatin-resistant ovarian cancer cell lines, we tested the hypothesis that downregulating hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1), which r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
124
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
7
124
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard, although the lack of induced apoptosis in the A2780 cell line after treatment with cisplatin doses as high as IC 90 had been previously reported, 17 controversial data may be found in the literature. 46,47 On the other hand, the lack of differences in cisplatin adducts between AT-0 and AT-1 times not only for the A2780 cells but also for the A549 and A2780cis cells (all repair active cells), demonstrated that there is an equilibrium between adducts being repaired/removed and new adducts being formed by the remaining intracellular cisplatin, at least in the 1 h time lapse studied, as suggested before. 48 Besides, the repair/removal of cisplatininduced DNA adducts in these cells seemed to be a relatively slow process, as described for A2780 23 and the other cells; 8,23,49 however, it is important to address that no adducts were detected 24 h after the end of treatment (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In this regard, although the lack of induced apoptosis in the A2780 cell line after treatment with cisplatin doses as high as IC 90 had been previously reported, 17 controversial data may be found in the literature. 46,47 On the other hand, the lack of differences in cisplatin adducts between AT-0 and AT-1 times not only for the A2780 cells but also for the A549 and A2780cis cells (all repair active cells), demonstrated that there is an equilibrium between adducts being repaired/removed and new adducts being formed by the remaining intracellular cisplatin, at least in the 1 h time lapse studied, as suggested before. 48 Besides, the repair/removal of cisplatininduced DNA adducts in these cells seemed to be a relatively slow process, as described for A2780 23 and the other cells; 8,23,49 however, it is important to address that no adducts were detected 24 h after the end of treatment (data not shown).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Many molecularly targeted anti-cancer drugs that have been approved or are in development, including inhibitors of EGFR, PI3K, and mTOR and even some chemotherapeutic agents, like cisplatin [39], downregulate HIF-1α directly or indirectly [9,40,41], which can lead to activation of AMPK. Thus, co-targeting ACC, which we found is a rational therapeutic strategy for treatment of cetuximab-resistant HNSCC, could also improve the outcomes of other therapies targeting the Warburg effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been well documented that both ionizing radiation and cisplatin can induce a high level of ROS, which contribute to the antitumor activity of these therapies [37,38]. It will be interesting, therefore, to determine whether the therapeutic benefits observed in patients treated with the combination of cetuximab with radiation or cisplatin are achieved, in whole or in part, via a mechanism similar to the one we observed with cetuximab plus DCA, i.e., cetuximab downregulates ASCT2 in tumors, thereby sensitizing cancer cells to radiation- or cisplatin-induced ROS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%