2017
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/aa573a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overcoming erasure errors with multilevel systems

Abstract: We investigate the usage of highly efficient error correcting codes of multilevel systems to protect encoded quantum information from erasure errors and implementation to repetitively correct these errors. Our scheme makes use of quantum polynomial codes to encode quantum information and generalizes teleportation based error correction for multilevel systems to correct photon losses and operation errors in a fault-tolerant manner. We discuss the application of quantum polynomial codes to one-way quantum repeat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
56
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(24) ← uniform random sample from [0, 1] // Success probability: eq. (6)24 if u ≤ p dist (w A , w B ) then retry , w retry ← sample_dist(n, d)28 return t + t retry , w retry 29 end 30 end bility distribution of T +1 is calculated from the distribution of the conditional random variable T +1 |K as…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(24) ← uniform random sample from [0, 1] // Success probability: eq. (6)24 if u ≤ p dist (w A , w B ) then retry , w retry ← sample_dist(n, d)28 return t + t retry , w retry 29 end 30 end bility distribution of T +1 is calculated from the distribution of the conditional random variable T +1 |K as…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that QECCs do not exist for all code parameters, e.g., all QECCs fulfill the quantum singleton bound 2d − 1 ≤ n. However, if D is a prime number and d ≤ (D − 1)/2, an explicit construction of 2d − 1, 1, d D QECCs saturating the quantum singleton bound is known in the form of quantum polynomial codes [56][57][58][59]. We focus on this encoding because quantum polynomial codes can give an advantage over other QECCs for quantum repeaters [31,32].…”
Section: Error-corrected Qudit Repeaters and The Quantum-repeater Gainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(See Refs. [31][32][33][34] for previous investigations in quantum repeaters based on qudits.) To conclude that a quantum repeater can overcome the PLOB-repeaterless bound, it is instrumental to find a lower bound on the achievable quantum capacity of quantum repeaters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feature appears to be crucial in the case where one can select a part of the whole quantum state, which is affected by the decoherence. It is important to note that the suggested scheme is able in principle to supplement existing error correction and error suppression techniques [13,[15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%