2023
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2418339/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overcoming lattice mismatch for heterostructures

Abstract: The formation of core-shell heterostructures allows direct contact for more efficient energy transfer and requires exquisite lattice match. Lattice mismatch is one of the most challenging obstacles for combining two components with different phases. In this work, we develop a strategy to successfully overcome the limitation of lattice mismatch for the first time andgrow α-phase lead halide perovskites (LHPs) onto β-phase lanthanide nanoparticles (LnNPs) by seeding ultrasmall sub-5 nm LnNPs. This LnNP@LHP heter… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 52 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For BAs and Janus-WSeTe, the lattice mismatch is only 3.3%, which is small when compared to other heterostructures. 51,52 Finally, in Table 1 the inclusion of dispersion correction in the PBE functional has a significant influence on the stability of heterostructures. 53 The most stable heterostructures H-I (stacking-D) and H-II (stacking-F) have lower interlayer spacing, d = 3.44 Å and d = 3.56 Å, respectively.…”
Section: Materials Advances Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For BAs and Janus-WSeTe, the lattice mismatch is only 3.3%, which is small when compared to other heterostructures. 51,52 Finally, in Table 1 the inclusion of dispersion correction in the PBE functional has a significant influence on the stability of heterostructures. 53 The most stable heterostructures H-I (stacking-D) and H-II (stacking-F) have lower interlayer spacing, d = 3.44 Å and d = 3.56 Å, respectively.…”
Section: Materials Advances Papermentioning
confidence: 99%