2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-37549/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overcoming Limitations in the Availability of Swabs Systems Used for SARS-CoV-2 Laboratory Diagnostics

Abstract: The diagnosis of COVID-19 relies on the direct detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in respiratory specimens by RT-PCR. The pandemic spread of the disease caused an imbalance between demand and supply of materials and reagents needed for diagnostic purposes including swab sets. In a comparative effectiveness study, we conducted serial follow-up swabs in hospitalized laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients. We assessed the diagnostic performance of an in-house system developed according to recommendations by the US CDC. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sensitivity of RT-PCR from throat swabs to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA has been reported to be up to 95% [ 15 ]. However, the sensitivity of RT-PCR depends on the type of specimen and the assay used [ 33 ]. It is unclear why in our patient the SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing results were negative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity of RT-PCR from throat swabs to detect SARS-CoV-2 RNA has been reported to be up to 95% [ 15 ]. However, the sensitivity of RT-PCR depends on the type of specimen and the assay used [ 33 ]. It is unclear why in our patient the SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing results were negative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the type of sample (e.g., blood, serum, sputum, nasal swabs, fecal matter, urine), collection methods, and sample preprocessing all play a vital role in detection regardless of the technique. For instance, the sensitivity of RT-PCR tests is dependent on the type of swab used[151].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%