2014
DOI: 10.1080/07303084.2014.884432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overcoming Marginalization of Physical Education in America's Schools with Professional Learning Communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Prie išorinių veiksnių priskiriami švietimo politikos veiksniai -švietimo dokumentuose nurodyti prioritetai, kadangi jie tampa orientyrais nuolatiniam mokytojų mokymuisi ir tobulėjimui, laiduojančiam nuolatinius pokyčius mokyklose bei mokinių mokymosi rezultatų gerinimą (Boyd, Hord, 1994;Bush, 2015); švietimo dokumentuose apibrėžta mokinių ugdymo paradigmų kaita, skatinanti mokytoją orientuotis į mokinį ir jo mokymosi rezultatus (Saito, Tsukui, 2008;Beddoes, Prusak ir Hall, 2014). Kaip išorinį veiksnį V. Boyd S. M. Hord (1994) nurodo mokyklų partnerystę su universitetais, kartu kuriant naujus ugdymo modelius ir būdus.…”
Section: Mpbb Kūrimosi Ir Plėtros Veiksnių Sisteminė Analizėunclassified
“…Prie išorinių veiksnių priskiriami švietimo politikos veiksniai -švietimo dokumentuose nurodyti prioritetai, kadangi jie tampa orientyrais nuolatiniam mokytojų mokymuisi ir tobulėjimui, laiduojančiam nuolatinius pokyčius mokyklose bei mokinių mokymosi rezultatų gerinimą (Boyd, Hord, 1994;Bush, 2015); švietimo dokumentuose apibrėžta mokinių ugdymo paradigmų kaita, skatinanti mokytoją orientuotis į mokinį ir jo mokymosi rezultatus (Saito, Tsukui, 2008;Beddoes, Prusak ir Hall, 2014). Kaip išorinį veiksnį V. Boyd S. M. Hord (1994) nurodo mokyklų partnerystę su universitetais, kartu kuriant naujus ugdymo modelius ir būdus.…”
Section: Mpbb Kūrimosi Ir Plėtros Veiksnių Sisteminė Analizėunclassified
“…(1988, p. 70) The call for a state-or nation-wide curriculum by some scholars in physical education has been heard since the mid-1980s, primarily in response to low expectations for the subject matter and negative perceptions of students, parents, and school administrators (though the idea of developing a national curriculum for physical education has also been rejected by many because of its rigidity and inflexibility). For many years, the profession of physical education has suffered from a lack of expectations for significant outcomes in K-12 education Sheehy, 2006) and has been regarded as a special, extracurricular subject within school cultures, often ridiculed and devalued by those outside the system (Beddoes, Prusak, & Hall, 2014;Siedentop, 1992). In addition, the media, including TV shows, movies, and comic strips, continue to portray physical education class and its teachers as frivolous, non-challenging, or militaristic (Duncan, Nolan, & Wood, 2002;Sheehy, 2011).…”
Section: Overview Of the National Curriculum In K-12 Physical Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The necessity to introduce the system of module-based rating of students in relation to their physical culture is discussed by I. Manzheley (Manzheley, & Cherniakova, 2014). The fact that there is a need in a comprehensive system for evaluation of physical developemnt of students studying in various universities is stated by Z. Beddoes who studies the dynamics of changes in the indicators demonstrated throughout the world (Beddoes, Prusak, & Hall, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%