2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2015.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overcoming the drawbacks of the FORM using a full characterization method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, although the FORM has been widely applied to approximate the probability of failure of engineering systems, it has been observed that FORM presents some serious drawbacks in several situations, such as low accuracy and convergence issues [3,4]. Hence, we proposed two fronts:…”
Section: Projects Developed Within the Rbdo Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, although the FORM has been widely applied to approximate the probability of failure of engineering systems, it has been observed that FORM presents some serious drawbacks in several situations, such as low accuracy and convergence issues [3,4]. Hence, we proposed two fronts:…”
Section: Projects Developed Within the Rbdo Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the key issue in the modern structural design is to properly consider the uncertainties and geometrical properties on the loads and materials when analyzing and designing complex structural systems. 1,2 In the last decades, the first-order second-moment (FOSM) and the second-order second-moment (SOSM) 3 and Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) 4,5 have been widely employed. These methods are the most frequently used tools to approximate the failure probability of engineering systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• the nature of the problems is different: in RBDO, the probability of failure is part of the constraints, while in RO, it is part of the objective function. • the great majority of these RBDO methods are based on the first-order reliability method (FORM), that may be inaccurate in the case of nonlinear limit state functions and non Gaussian random variables [26,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%