2014
DOI: 10.5596/c09-020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overcoming the linguistic divide: a barrier to consumer health information

Abstract: Seeking health information online has become very popular. Despite this popularity, health consumers face many barriers to successfully retrieving good quality health information. This paper reviews the literature on the linguistic divide between health consumers and consumer health information. Consumer health vocabularies (CHV) and natural language processing (NLP) show potential for bridging the divide, thereby improving recall and precision from information retrieval systems. Developers of digital librarie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Looking through the lens of the conceptual framework of tasks (Byström & Hansen, 2005), the topic of interest and the information goal were attributes of search tasks, with the former defining the subject of information that users need, and the latter defining the type and amount of information needed, as well as the level of effort demanded. Consistent with previous studies (Boden, 2009), this study observed that users misspelled terms, used acronyms, and had difficulties expressing their needs in proper medical terms. These difficulties could prevent users from retrieving optimal search results (Fidel, 1991;Zeng et al, 2004).…”
Section: Layered Model Of Context For Consumer Health Information Seasupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Looking through the lens of the conceptual framework of tasks (Byström & Hansen, 2005), the topic of interest and the information goal were attributes of search tasks, with the former defining the subject of information that users need, and the latter defining the type and amount of information needed, as well as the level of effort demanded. Consistent with previous studies (Boden, 2009), this study observed that users misspelled terms, used acronyms, and had difficulties expressing their needs in proper medical terms. These difficulties could prevent users from retrieving optimal search results (Fidel, 1991;Zeng et al, 2004).…”
Section: Layered Model Of Context For Consumer Health Information Seasupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Understanding contexts is even more important in the case of health information searching, as health concerns are not only extremely personal, but also require highly specialized knowledge to comprehend. The personal nature of health concerns indicates that users need information that is not only relevant to their health conditions, but also applicable to their specific social and cognitive conditions; the specialized nature of health information implies that consumers often lack medical domain knowledge, and thus have difficulties both in articulating their needs (Boden, ; Zeng et al., ), and in making relevance judgments (Arora et al., ). Thus, an enhanced ability of a system to support health information searching hinges on its ability to provide users with more personalized interactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems that to better support specific health‐related tasks, systems should provide a more “natural” user interface to accommodate users' behavior of writing full sentences rather than artificial keywords (Hearst, ). This function could be particularly useful for health information searching, as users tend to have difficulties with medical vocabularies (Boden, ). Allowing them to provide longer descriptions of their needs will likely enhance the chance of finding information that matches their cognitive situations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three levels of difficulty have been identified. At the term level, they misspelled medical terms; at the conceptual level, they were not able to formulate specific keywords to describe their intentions; and at the mental model level, they tended to misunderstand their current conditions (Boden, ; Zeng et al., ; Zhang, ). These difficulties could lead to failed searches and subsequent user frustration (Zeng et al., ).…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are common semantic category associations (Dogan et al, 2009); Terms do not always match standard vocabularies (Keselman et al, 2008;Zhang & Fu, 2011), inappropriate terms due to misspelling errors and abbreviations are common (Boden, 2009;Zhang & Fu, 2011), a query may contain two or three subqueries covering different facets of the information need (Zhang & Fu, 2011)…”
Section: Query Structure Vocabularymentioning
confidence: 99%