SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2004 2004
DOI: 10.1190/1.1839685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overcoming thrust‐belt imaging problems in Magdalena Valley, Colombia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The velocity model is simply a horizontal reflector at the base of a homogeneous dipping anisotropic layer, 2000 m in vertical thickness, with an axis of symmetry tilted at 15° from the vertical. The anisotropic parameters used for the overburden in these tests were chosen to be ɛ= 0.12 and δ= 0.03, which are commonly used values in thrust‐belt anisotropic depth migration (e.g., Vestrum 2002; Gittins, Vestrum and Gillcrist 2004). Figure 2 shows minimum‐traveltime raypaths for offsets ranging from 0–4000 metres for this model.…”
Section: Raytrace Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The velocity model is simply a horizontal reflector at the base of a homogeneous dipping anisotropic layer, 2000 m in vertical thickness, with an axis of symmetry tilted at 15° from the vertical. The anisotropic parameters used for the overburden in these tests were chosen to be ɛ= 0.12 and δ= 0.03, which are commonly used values in thrust‐belt anisotropic depth migration (e.g., Vestrum 2002; Gittins, Vestrum and Gillcrist 2004). Figure 2 shows minimum‐traveltime raypaths for offsets ranging from 0–4000 metres for this model.…”
Section: Raytrace Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%