2001
DOI: 10.1007/s004420100647
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overcompensation through the paternal component of fitness in Ipomopsis arizonica

Abstract: Estimates of the effects of herbivory on plant fitness based on female fitness alone may be misleading if plants experience either reduced or increased male fitness. Because there are many plants that produce more flowers following herbivory where seed set is unaffected or reduced, total fitness may be enhanced through the paternal component alone. Here we show that herbivory results in an increase in reproductive success due solely to an increase in paternal fitness in the monocarpic biennial Ipomopsis arizon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This partly explains the positive association between stem biomass and compensatory ability, and the differences among accessions found in our study, since most of the stem mass of Arabidopsis corresponds to the inflorescence, and accessions vary in their inflorescence:rosette size ratio. Stem mass could also be important because of its correlation with meristem availability, which seems crucial to tolerance in monocarpic, rosulate plants such as Ipomopsis (Paige et al 2001), but is also important in trees and shrubs (Lehtila and Larsson 2005;Pratt et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This partly explains the positive association between stem biomass and compensatory ability, and the differences among accessions found in our study, since most of the stem mass of Arabidopsis corresponds to the inflorescence, and accessions vary in their inflorescence:rosette size ratio. Stem mass could also be important because of its correlation with meristem availability, which seems crucial to tolerance in monocarpic, rosulate plants such as Ipomopsis (Paige et al 2001), but is also important in trees and shrubs (Lehtila and Larsson 2005;Pratt et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, clipping generally occurs no later than just following anthesis of an inflorescence's first florets, so pollen dispersal from clipped heads is probably inconsequential. More generally, any compensatory response to damage by a seed-feeding herbivore that involves producing additional inflorescences might, depending on the timing of damage, lead to greater compensation through the paternal, as compared to the maternal, contribution to fitness (e.g., Paige et al 2001). The effect of herbivory on the maternal and paternal contributions to plant fitness have only rarely been examined, but the data suggest that compensatory responses through male and female function can be either similar (Gronemeyer et al 1997 or variable (Paige et al 2001).…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies that have found positive or negligible effects of herbivory have been criticized for measuring growth rather than a more direct measure of fitness (e.g., seed production), or for using mechanical damage to simulate herbivory, a procedure that does not necessarily elicit the same responses in plants as real herbivore damage (Belsky 1986;Baldwin 1990; Karban and Baldwin 1997; see also Tiffin and Inouye 2000;Tiffin 2000;Lehtilä 2003;Inouye and Tiffin 2003). Nevertheless, careful studies have demonstrated that plants do not always suffer a negative impact due to herbivory in terms of variables that are convincingly good measures of plant fitness, either through female or male function (Dyer et al 1993;Gronemeyer et al 1997;Lennartsson et al 1998;Paige 1999;Paige et al 2001;AvilaSakar et al 2003). Therefore, recent studies of plant defence consider not only traits that decrease the frequency of herbivore attack (resistance), but also the ability of plants to reduce the detrimental effects of herbivory on their fitness (tolerance) (Trumble et al 1993;Strauss and Agrawal 1999;Pilson 2000;Juenger and Lennartsson 2000;Tiffin 2000;Stowe et al 2000;Strauss et al 2003;Leimu and Koricheva 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%