2022
DOI: 10.1002/hep.32284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overdiagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: Prevented by guidelines?

Abstract: Overdiagnosis refers to detection of disease that would not otherwise become clinically apparent during a patient's lifetime. Overdiagnosis is common and has been reported for several cancer types, although there are few studies describing its prevalence in HCC surveillance programs. Overdiagnosis can have serious negative consequences including overtreatment and associated complications, financial toxicity, and psychological harms related to being labeled with a cancer diagnosis. Overdiagnosis can occur for s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 149 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 40 Furthermore, there is a dearth of data on contemporary populations of patients, such as those with nonalcohol-related fatty liver disease and post–sustained virologic response cirrhosis, in whom indolent growth patterns may be more likely and there are higher competing risks of noncancer mortality, potentially increasing chances of overdiagnosis. 41 , 42 , 43 Despite these imperfect data, several studies have demonstrated a favorable risk-benefit ratio of HCC surveillance, and modeling studies have suggested the practice is likely cost-effective. 43 , 44 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 40 Furthermore, there is a dearth of data on contemporary populations of patients, such as those with nonalcohol-related fatty liver disease and post–sustained virologic response cirrhosis, in whom indolent growth patterns may be more likely and there are higher competing risks of noncancer mortality, potentially increasing chances of overdiagnosis. 41 , 42 , 43 Despite these imperfect data, several studies have demonstrated a favorable risk-benefit ratio of HCC surveillance, and modeling studies have suggested the practice is likely cost-effective. 43 , 44 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 41 , 42 , 43 Despite these imperfect data, several studies have demonstrated a favorable risk-benefit ratio of HCC surveillance, and modeling studies have suggested the practice is likely cost-effective. 43 , 44 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To the best of our knowledge, our study is one of the first to show that visualisation limitations were also associated with higher odds of false‐positive ultrasound results. Notably, false‐positive results can result in physical, financial and psychological screening‐related harms and thereby decrease the overall value of surveillance programmes 10,21,22 . These data are particularly concerning given that poor visualisation is more likely to occur in patients with obesity and non‐viral aetiologies of cirrhosis, which are increasingly common populations undergoing HCC surveillance 23,24 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, false-positive results can result in physical, financial and psychological screening-related harms and thereby decrease the overall value of surveillance programmes. 10,21,22 These data are particularly concerning given that poor visualisation is more likely to occur in patients with obesity and non-viral aetiologies of cirrhosis, which are increasingly common populations undergoing HCC surveillance. 23,24 Our findings suggest that while moderate visualisation limitations (Vis score B) may impair the differentiation of benign observations (eg, dysplastic nodules, heterogeneous parenchyma) from malignant lesions, the examination quality may be sufficiently adequate for detecting true HCC nodules.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, screening for HCC in our cohort of cirrhosis SVR patients will have been much higher than in the GP. This could have led to an ascertainment bias, particularly if there is a potential for HCC deaths to be misattributed to other causes or if HCC overdiagnosis (34) exists in cirrhosis SVR patients. This issue is not well understood but could potentially have led us to overstate the difference in HCC incidence between our cohort and the GP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%