2016
DOI: 10.4045/tidsskr.16.0572
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overdiagnostikk – norske allmennleger viser vei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Given limited total capacity for healthcare delivery, overtreatment of one patient may limit healthcare access for another person who may truly need care, causing harm to people other than the overtreated patient, which on a broad scale amounts to societal harm 64. In addition, health system investment in overtreatment deflects resources from other pressing medical needs and represents lost opportunity to improve the health of the public 6566…”
Section: Consequences Of Overdiagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given limited total capacity for healthcare delivery, overtreatment of one patient may limit healthcare access for another person who may truly need care, causing harm to people other than the overtreated patient, which on a broad scale amounts to societal harm 64. In addition, health system investment in overtreatment deflects resources from other pressing medical needs and represents lost opportunity to improve the health of the public 6566…”
Section: Consequences Of Overdiagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…of blood cholesterol) and to the use of various methods for additional risk determination, which often have insufficient documentation (16). Problems associated with overdiagnosis in Norwegian medical practice have been discussed recently in this journal (17).…”
Section: Knowledge Base and Clinical Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Institusjonelle forandringer har i løpet av de siste 10-15 årene blitt studert ved hjelp av begrepet the paradox of embedded agency (Battilana, Leca og Boxenbaum 2009;Hardy og Maguire, 2008, 2017. Begrepet brukes for å undersøke «how organizations or individuals whose beliefs and actions are determined by existing institutions can break with these very same institutions and innovate» (Battilana mfl., 2009, s. 72).…”
Section: Synnøve Jansenunclassified