Overdoing Gender: A Test of the Masculine Overcompensation Thesis

Abstract

The masculine overcompensation thesis asserts that men react to masculinity threats with extreme demonstrations of masculinity, a proposition tested here across four studies. In study 1, men and women were randomly given feedback suggesting they were either masculine or feminine. Women showed no effects when told they were masculine; however, men given feedback suggesting they were feminine expressed more support for war, homophobic attitudes, and interest in purchasing an SUV. Study 2 found that threatened men expressed greater support for, and desire to advance in, dominance hierarchies. Study 3 showed in a large-scale survey on a diverse sample that men who reported that social changes threatened the status of men also reported more homophopic and prodominance attitudes, support for war, and belief in male superiority. Finally, study 4 found that higher testosterone men showed stronger reactions to masculinity threats than those lower in testosterone. Together, these results support the masculine overcompensation thesis, show how it can shape political and cultural attitudes, and identify a hormonal factor influencing the effect.

Linguistic Markers of Status in Food Culture: Bourdieu’s Distinction in a Menu Corpus

“…33 Finally, this use of overly explicit descriptions by less expensive restaurants might also be modeled as a kind of overcompensation, in which a group that is anxious about its status overcompensates in the cues for that status; this kind of overcompensation is common both in linguistics, in the hypercorrection seen in speakers of non-standard styles, 34 or the overcompensation seen in other social categories like masculinity. 35 While our results are generally consistent with prior literature, there are some differences. Our finding that inexpensive restaurants are more likely to emphasize consumer choice as compared with expensive restaurants seems inconsistent with work finding that European-Americans of higher socio-economic status (SES) emphasize personal choice more than those of lower SES.…”

Are Girls more Resilient to Gender-Conformity Pressure? The Association Between Gender-Conformity Pressure and Academic Self-Efficacy

“…2 The association between sex, pressure for gender conformity and academic self-efficacy, controlled for well-being link to higher scores on academic self-efficacy (Vantieghem et al 2014) and Belgian teachers' preference for girls is partly explained by the higher perceived teachability of girls (Van Houtte 2007). Because people who experience pressure tend to exaggerate their behavior (Weinstein et al 2012;Willer et al 2013), girls under pressure could try to emulate the ideal type of the typically feminine girl and inadvertently raise their compliance to educational standards, heightening their academic self-efficacy in the process.…”

A pawn in someone else's game?: The cognitive, motivational, and paradigmatic barriers to women's excelling in negotiation

“…Generally, men do not respond positively to threats to their masculinity (Willer, Rogalin, Conlon, & Wojnowicz, 2013). One common response is aggression, which reduces negative affect following a masculinity threat (Bosson, Vandello, Burnaford, Weaver, & Wasti, 2009).…”