2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.labeco.2013.04.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overeducation at the start of the career: Stepping stone or trap?

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
129
1
6

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 165 publications
(150 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
12
129
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, these unlucky generations are trapped in these lower quality jobs and definitely miss the opportunity to be hired in career jobs with a steeper seniority pay profile. In line with this hypothesis, the aforementioned study of Baert et al (2013) demonstrates that young unemployed graduates who accept a job for which they are overeducated remain trapped in these jobs for many years. This explains why the wage penalty rises over time rather than gradually fades, as in more flexible labor markets (Genda et al, 2010;Oreopoulos et al, 2012).…”
Section: The Findings For the High Educatedmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Hence, these unlucky generations are trapped in these lower quality jobs and definitely miss the opportunity to be hired in career jobs with a steeper seniority pay profile. In line with this hypothesis, the aforementioned study of Baert et al (2013) demonstrates that young unemployed graduates who accept a job for which they are overeducated remain trapped in these jobs for many years. This explains why the wage penalty rises over time rather than gradually fades, as in more flexible labor markets (Genda et al, 2010;Oreopoulos et al, 2012).…”
Section: The Findings For the High Educatedmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…We observe that the wage penalty rises steadily (and significantly) from then onwards, starting at -3.2% after three years and attaining -4.4% after ten years. The initial wage penalty suggests that high educated graduates are forced to accept lower quality jobs for which they are possibly overeducated (see Baert et al (2013) for evidence on this using the same survey data) and which pay lower wages.…”
Section: The Findings For the High Educatedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical evidence, however, does not univocally support this individualistic perspective (e.g. Baert et al, 2013). At early stages, over-education can be a stumbling block instead of a stepping stone.…”
Section: Life Course Patternsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As shown by Berlingieri and Erdsiek (2012), overqualified graduates more often accepted a job in order to avoid unemployment than matched graduates. Baert et al (2013) point out that being overqualified shortly after graduation K delays the transition into an adequate job. One explanation could be that overqualification sends an even more negative productivity signal to potential employers than unemployment (McCormick 1990).…”
Section: Capital Transmitted Within Familiesmentioning
confidence: 99%