2017
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00284
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overestimation of Crop Root Biomass in Field Experiments Due to Extraneous Organic Matter

Abstract: Root biomass is one of the most relevant root parameters for studies of plant response to environmental change, soil carbon modeling or estimations of soil carbon sequestration. A major source of error in root biomass quantification of agricultural crops in the field is the presence of extraneous organic matter in soil: dead roots from previous crops, weed roots, incorporated above ground plant residues and organic soil amendments, or remnants of soil fauna. Using the isotopic difference between recent maize r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is highly reasonable that root biomass, RL, and root surface area could be distributed differently in soil mass. For mature maize plants, the shallow axial roots are usually thicker and occupy a larger root biomass proportion, while the lateral roots are generally more slender and denser, exhibit deeper extension and had higher values in RL and root surface area (do Rosário G. Oliveira et al., 2000; Hirte et al., 2017; Pagès & Pellerin, 1994; Peng et al., 2010). More importantly, our study further clarified that FM treatment had less RL and root surface area in the 0.60−1.00‐m soil at the R1 stage (Figures 4 and 5) and less root biomass in the 0.40−0.80‐m soil at the R3 stage (Figure 3) compared to the control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is highly reasonable that root biomass, RL, and root surface area could be distributed differently in soil mass. For mature maize plants, the shallow axial roots are usually thicker and occupy a larger root biomass proportion, while the lateral roots are generally more slender and denser, exhibit deeper extension and had higher values in RL and root surface area (do Rosário G. Oliveira et al., 2000; Hirte et al., 2017; Pagès & Pellerin, 1994; Peng et al., 2010). More importantly, our study further clarified that FM treatment had less RL and root surface area in the 0.60−1.00‐m soil at the R1 stage (Figures 4 and 5) and less root biomass in the 0.40−0.80‐m soil at the R3 stage (Figure 3) compared to the control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From every plot, deep soil cores were extracted using a steel probe (6.2 cm diameter) attached to a hydraulic Giddings machine (Windsor, CO). Cores were divided into sections (0-15, 15-30, 30-60, 60-90, 90-120, 120-150, 150-180 and 180−210 cm) and stored at 4 o C prior to root cleaning following Ordóñez et al (2018b), which consisted of separating root tissues from soil by using a Hydropneumatic Elutriation washing system (Smucker et al, 1982;Hirte et al, 2017;Gillison's Variety Fabrication).…”
Section: Below-ground Root Sampling Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By contrast, maize seedlings grown in better hydrothermal conditions (i.e., rainy 2015 or FM treatment) showed shorter RL per plant at the V3 stage (Figure 4). The different performances of RL and root biomass at the V3 stage was probably due to the fact that RL was mainly contributed by capillary root (Peng, Niu, Peng, Zhang, & Li, 2010), but capillary root only accounted for a small proportion of root dry weight (Hirte et al, 2017;Peng et al, 2010). Furthermore, it seemed that the plant preferred the changes of RL rather than root biomass to mitigate unsuitable soil circumstance (Freschet, Swart, & Cornelissen, 2015;Ryser & Lambers, 1995;Weiner, 2004).…”
Section: Root Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%