2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2014.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overexpression of NMDAR2B in an inflammatory model of Alzheimer's disease: Modulation by NOS inhibitors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(48 reference statements)
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unlike our in vitro experiments, these results suggest the possibility of no participation of NOS in vivo. However, it was reported that NOS inhibitors of nNOS, inducible NOS (iNOS), and eNOS had favorable effects on cognitive function in several AD mouse models (Maher et al, 2014;Santhanam et al, 2015). Given the differences observed in vivo and in vitro, because nNOS expression is naturally downregulated in the hippocampus of SAMP8 (Han et al, 2010), it could be difficult to evaluate the effect of nNOS as shown in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Unlike our in vitro experiments, these results suggest the possibility of no participation of NOS in vivo. However, it was reported that NOS inhibitors of nNOS, inducible NOS (iNOS), and eNOS had favorable effects on cognitive function in several AD mouse models (Maher et al, 2014;Santhanam et al, 2015). Given the differences observed in vivo and in vitro, because nNOS expression is naturally downregulated in the hippocampus of SAMP8 (Han et al, 2010), it could be difficult to evaluate the effect of nNOS as shown in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the case of trehalose, L-NAME and carbamazepine, several studies show that their therapeutic effects in AD models are concomitantly accompanied by autophagy induction (Kruger et al, 2012;Pierzynowska et al, 2018;Sarkar, 2013); However, a mechanistic link between these observations was not demonstrated. In this context, it should be noted that L-NAME is a well-known inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, which could be negatively involved in AD-associated neuroinflammation (Maher, El-Sayed, Breitinger, & Gad, 2014), and that the effect of trehalose in AD was suggested to be mediated by its direct interaction with tau and Aβ (Kruger et al, 2012;Liu, Barkhordarian, Emadi, Park, & Sierks, 2005). Indeed, Portbury et al (2017) reported that the beneficial effects of trehalsoe in the Tg2576 mouse model of AD were independent of autophagy induction.…”
Section: Evaluating the Role Of Autophagy Induction In Ad: Open Quementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that recruitment of the Ca 2? -dependent enzyme nNOS via PSD95 is a key contributor to neuronal dysfunction [19][20][21][22][23][24]. Our result showed that interaction of APPL1 with PSD95 through the PDZ2 domain results in activation of the neuroprotective Akt pathway.…”
Section: Appl1 S707a Disrupts Synaptic Activity-mediated Activation Omentioning
confidence: 87%