2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0090-8258(02)00073-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overexpression of the c-Met/HGF receptor and its prognostic significance in uterine cervix carcinomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
63
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
2
63
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…They have all been reported to be related to either cervical tumorigenesis or its progression. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Further clarification of their functional role in cervical malignancy would be warranted. Six previously FIGURE 6 -Potential signaling pathways involved in cervical cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have all been reported to be related to either cervical tumorigenesis or its progression. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] Further clarification of their functional role in cervical malignancy would be warranted. Six previously FIGURE 6 -Potential signaling pathways involved in cervical cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cervical cancer, the prognostic value of the HGF receptor was clarified by Baykal et al (46), therefore, in addition to these traditional prognostic indicators, including FIGO stage and pelvic lymph node metastasis, the pre-treatment serum levels of HGF may be a predictor of tumor progression in certain early stage cervical carcinomas.…”
Section: ------------------------------------------------------------mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Met gene amplification has been found in gastric and colorectal tumors (14)(15)(16)(17) and was recently proposed as a mechanism for acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in lung cancer (18,19). Clinically, overexpression and/ or dysregulation of Met and/or HGF correlates with a poor prognostic outcome in patients with a diverse array of malignancies (20)(21)(22)(23)(24).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%