2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.mar.2010.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overhead cost allocation changes in a transfer pricing tax compliant multinational enterprise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
15
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This discrepancy is overcome by case-based research that investigates transfer pricing at the subunit level (Boyns et al, 1999;Colbert and Spicer, 1995;Cools et al, 2008;Eccles, 1985;Rossing and Rohde, 2010;Van der Meer-Kooistra, 1994;Van Helden et al, 2001). However, most of this case-based research focuses on domestic transfer pricing and thus neglects the tax compliance role of international transfer pricing (Boyns et al, 1999;Colbert and Spicer, 1995;Van der Meer-Kooistra, 1994).…”
Section: Related Transfer Pricing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This discrepancy is overcome by case-based research that investigates transfer pricing at the subunit level (Boyns et al, 1999;Colbert and Spicer, 1995;Cools et al, 2008;Eccles, 1985;Rossing and Rohde, 2010;Van der Meer-Kooistra, 1994;Van Helden et al, 2001). However, most of this case-based research focuses on domestic transfer pricing and thus neglects the tax compliance role of international transfer pricing (Boyns et al, 1999;Colbert and Spicer, 1995;Van der Meer-Kooistra, 1994).…”
Section: Related Transfer Pricing Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For these reasons, the advantages of decoupled over integrated tax compliant transfer prices are questionable, in particular, since transfer pricing and management control systems are highly complex and dynamic instead of exogenously given and static (the latter being common assumptions in analytical modeling). Recently, case-based studies have analyzed the consequences of implementing a single-book tax compliant transfer pricing system for the design and use of various components of the management control system (Cools, 2014;Cools et al, 2008;Cools and Slagmulder, 2009;Rossing and Rohde, 2010). However, besides these case-based studies, little empirical evidence exists on how firms address the conflict between management control purposes and tax compliance and on the degree of integration of transfer pricing systems into management control systems from an overall perspective.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A alocação de custos e despesas de overhead aos objetos de custeio com a utilização de critérios arbitrários têm sido alvo de debates (ROSSING;ROHDE, 2010, p. 201;TAYLES, 2006, p. 405;CHOUDHURY, 1990, p. 217;DOOST, 1996, p. 15;BRIERLEY et al, 2001a, p. 223) pela falta de acurácia na mensuração de custos de produtos. Porém, a utilização de critérios arbitrários e até mesmo subjetivos não fundamenta a limitação do método, mas da aplicação por parte de quem exerce estes critérios (RELVAS, 2003, p. 135).…”
Section: Antecedentesunclassified
“…Porém, Drury e Tales (1994) acabam se concentrando somente na discussão do propósito de utilização de métodos de custeio para a formação de preços. Outros pesquisadores também se concentraram em propósitos específicos, como avaliação de estoques (PONG;MITCHELL, 2006;BAXENDALE, 2010;SOPARIWALA, 2009;DUGDALE;JONES, 1997), formação de preços e análise de lucratividade (ROSSING;ROHDE, 2010;LUCAS;RAFFERTY, 2008;BANKER et al, 2008;TAYLES, 2006;LUKKA;GRANLUND, 1996;BRIGNALL et al, 1991); induzindo à concepção de que estes propósitos (avaliação de inventários, formação de preços e análise de lucratividade) são os principais aos quais os métodos de custeio atendem.…”
Section: Métodos De Custeio E Seus Propósitosunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation