2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overland flow modeling in a vegetative filter considering non-planar topography and spatial variability of soil hydraulic properties and vegetation density

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[5] At the local scale, microtopography produces nonuniform runoff patterns-segregating flow into narrow, relatively deep and fast-flow zones where velocity can be 2-7 times higher than the average flow as well as broader, shallower, slower-moving zones where velocity may approach zero [Dunkerley, 2003[Dunkerley, , 2004Römkens et al, 1986].Theoretical estimates [Thompson et al, 2010a[Thompson et al, , 2010b showed that, with the effects of slope and local depressions, microtopography can increase rainfall infiltration by more than 20%,compared with the flat, planar slope case in which microtopography is absent. Microtopography has been included in previous modeling studies aimed to investigate its overall impact on runoff [Tayfur et al, 1993;Helmers and Eisenhauer, 2006;Appels et al, 2011], but its impact on spatial variability of the rainfall-runoff process requires further investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5] At the local scale, microtopography produces nonuniform runoff patterns-segregating flow into narrow, relatively deep and fast-flow zones where velocity can be 2-7 times higher than the average flow as well as broader, shallower, slower-moving zones where velocity may approach zero [Dunkerley, 2003[Dunkerley, , 2004Römkens et al, 1986].Theoretical estimates [Thompson et al, 2010a[Thompson et al, , 2010b showed that, with the effects of slope and local depressions, microtopography can increase rainfall infiltration by more than 20%,compared with the flat, planar slope case in which microtopography is absent. Microtopography has been included in previous modeling studies aimed to investigate its overall impact on runoff [Tayfur et al, 1993;Helmers and Eisenhauer, 2006;Appels et al, 2011], but its impact on spatial variability of the rainfall-runoff process requires further investigation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategies to reduce N export from agricultural lands have included the establishment of riparian buffer systems (Dosskey et al, 2002;Lovell and Sullivan, 2006) and, more recently, the incorporation of small amounts of prairie vegetation strips (PVS) in strategic locations within crop fields Helmers and Eisenhauer, 2006). Both riparian buffers and PVS function as physical barriers that reduce N losses by minimizing soil erosion (Dosskey, 2001;Dosskey et al, 2002;Helmers and Eisenhauer, 2006;Hernández-Santana et al, 2013;Zhou et al, 2010Zhou et al, , 2014.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both riparian buffers and PVS function as physical barriers that reduce N losses by minimizing soil erosion (Dosskey, 2001;Dosskey et al, 2002;Helmers and Eisenhauer, 2006;Hernández-Santana et al, 2013;Zhou et al, 2010Zhou et al, , 2014. Additionally, riparian buffers and PVS retain NO 3 -N through biogeochemical transformations resulting from plant uptake and microbial processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other steady uniform flow formulations, such as the Manning's friction factor (n) can also be used to replace D. A practical advantage to formulating water flow rates using a standard open channel equation are twofold: (1) such resistance equations have a long history of describing bulk velocities reasonably well in surface flows and ensure that the intrinsic nonlinearities in the Q i versus H w are preserved, and (2) on the monitoring side, they hold promise for the possibility of combining SAR data with canopy light detection and ranging (lidar) data, now capable of measuring canopy height (h c ), and leaf area density (a), both variables known to impact the friction factor f in addition to H w . Various flume and field studies have already shown that n and f depend on the drag coefficient (C d ) imposed by the vegetation, a, H w , and h c as well as the bulk Reynolds number [Baptist, 2003;Carollo et al, 2002;Helmers and Eisenhauer, 2006;Helmio, 2002;Jarvela, 2002;Musleh and Cruise, 2006;Shi et al, 1995;Stone and Shen, 2002;Tsihrintzis and Madiedo, 2000;Wilson et al, 2003]. General formulations linking all these variables to resistance factors remain the subject of active research, especially in submerged canopies, and their potential use in continental-scale hydrologic models (e.g., an estimate of D) provides additional motivation for progress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%