2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2017.11.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overlapping community detection in heterogeneous social networks via the user model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretically, the network is represented by a graph G = (V, E) where V the set of nodes representing the individuals and E the set of edges representing the interactions between them. Figure 1 shows an example of a network with V = 10 (0, 1, 2, 3,4,5,6,7,8,9) and E the set of edges connecting nodes like (1 − 7, 6 − 7, 3 − 5, 3 − 4, ...).…”
Section: Backgrounds Of Community Detection In Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theoretically, the network is represented by a graph G = (V, E) where V the set of nodes representing the individuals and E the set of edges representing the interactions between them. Figure 1 shows an example of a network with V = 10 (0, 1, 2, 3,4,5,6,7,8,9) and E the set of edges connecting nodes like (1 − 7, 6 − 7, 3 − 5, 3 − 4, ...).…”
Section: Backgrounds Of Community Detection In Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disjoint methods build a disjoint partitioning of the network where each actor is assigned to only one community. However, given that actors usually operate in several communities such as in the research domain where professors usually collaborate with several researchers in different fields or in social domains where a person has his family group as well as friends group at the same time, assigning an actor to only one community do not reflect real structures in the network [6,7]. Nondisjoint community detection methods solve this issue and allow actors to be assigned to one or several communities resulting in an overlapping partitioning of the network.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Moosavi et al (2017) have proposed an approach based on the interests, frequent patterns, actions and finally activities of users on networks. A year later, 2018, many other models have been proposed like that of Huang et al (2018) who proposed a new model of detection of overlapping communities in heterogeneous SNs via the user model. Also, Ahajjam et al (2018) proposed a new scalable leader-community detection approach.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental results show that the model is more competitive than commonly used models. Huang et al [11] built a user model of heterogeneous networks with undirected and directed edges and applied the model to propose a new approach to overlapping community detection in heterogeneous social networks (OCD-HSN). Compared with the existing state-of-the-art algorithms, this method shows higher accuracy and lower time consumption under the real social network.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Elmongui et al [7], Qian et al [8], Eirinaki et al [9], and Jiang et al [10] each proposed a recommendation service method based on user interests. Huang et al [11], Bhattacharya et al [12], Zarrinkalam et al [13], [14], and Li et al [15] focused on interest modeling for Internet users for different goals and tasks. Moreover, Kapanipathi et al [16], Xu et al [17], and Piao and Breslin [18] focused on Interest mining for Internet users based on access logs, microblog/blog accessing, and content and behavior of browsing, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%