2018
DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2018.2817127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overlapping Laser Micro-Doppler Feature Extraction and Separation of Weak Vibration Targets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LHD has an advantage over laser direct detection in terms of accuracy and sensitivity in acquiring the multidimensional motion information of a target [3][4][5][6][7]. In LIDAR application scenarios, such as synthetic aperture lidar and advanced remote sensing [8][9][10][11][12][13][14], etc., surface topography undulations of a moving target or atmospheric turbulence can lead to random phase fluctuations at different points in the optical field, thus introducing random phase noise [15,16]. The random phase noise eventually leads to decoherence of the target echo [8,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LHD has an advantage over laser direct detection in terms of accuracy and sensitivity in acquiring the multidimensional motion information of a target [3][4][5][6][7]. In LIDAR application scenarios, such as synthetic aperture lidar and advanced remote sensing [8][9][10][11][12][13][14], etc., surface topography undulations of a moving target or atmospheric turbulence can lead to random phase fluctuations at different points in the optical field, thus introducing random phase noise [15,16]. The random phase noise eventually leads to decoherence of the target echo [8,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterodyne lidar systems can achieve high detection sensitivity and better spatial resolution, which are widely used in target detection, especially in laser ranging, 1 synthetic aperture lidar 2 and vibration measurement. 3 The adoption of local oscillator (LO) light can improve the noise reduction ability, 4 and the matching characteristics between laser returns and LO are among the key factors deciding the detection performance. The waveform matching is quite challenging in laser return detection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The state difference matrix restricted the association of different Kalman filters with different frequency points at the next moment. In [20], multiple scattering centres were associated with the poles of the TVAR model rather than the frequencies. The association processes of the above methods are all carried out in the time-frequency domain, in which the instantaneous frequency curves of different scattering centres usually intersect and are prone to be associated incorrectly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%