2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-014-0007-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overly ambitious critics and the Medici Effect: a reply to Kampen and Tamás

Abstract: The critical audit of Q methodology by Kampen and Tamás contains many errors of fact and understanding-indeed, a resistance to understanding that is compared to the Medicis' stance toward Galileo. Following a brief historical summary of similar ill-advised critiques of Q methodology in the 80 years since its introduction, responses are presented to various of the points raised: on the nature of subjectivity, the universe of subjective communicability (concourse) and samples drawn from it, the role of factor an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By delineating and describing discourses on (effective) mangrove conservation and management we gain insight into their complexity (Brown et al, 2014). The shared values and perspectivesincluded in areas of consensus between the identified discoursescan then be used as a basis to determine shared stakeholder objectives, which are relevant in a decision-making context (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By delineating and describing discourses on (effective) mangrove conservation and management we gain insight into their complexity (Brown et al, 2014). The shared values and perspectivesincluded in areas of consensus between the identified discoursescan then be used as a basis to determine shared stakeholder objectives, which are relevant in a decision-making context (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants were given instructions on how to rank the milestones by Q-sort methodology. Q-sort methodology enables researchers with some limitation to study subjectivity using a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods ( Brown, Danielson & Van Exel, 2014 ). It prioritizes the opinions of an observer ( Brown, 1996 ) and provides an organized means of identifying priorities and areas of divergent opinions within a group ( Valenta & Wigger, 1997 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of Q-methodology does not lead to the production of statistically generalizable results across populations, but rather the positions uncovered are themselves generalisations about the universe of discourse [81] (p. 534). We do not claim that the factors and stances identified are exhaustive of all the possibilities of young people's understandings of citizenship.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%