2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2009.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overmathematisation in game theory: pitting the Nash Equilibrium Refinement Programme against the Epistemic Programme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Route information, such as element identifiers and names, is encoded in Lu at el. [14]'s complex Dewey encoding [18].…”
Section: Rn Matching Twigmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Route information, such as element identifiers and names, is encoded in Lu at el. [14]'s complex Dewey encoding [18].…”
Section: Rn Matching Twigmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First of all, cognitive 20 In this spirit, I follow in the footsteps of the established programme of epistemic game theory, aiming to clarify solution concepts and their underlying epistemic principles. See more on this in de Bruin (2009) or Perea (2012).…”
Section: Correct Beliefs and Belief In Rationalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Game theory has been very successful in developing a deeper understanding of how decisions of rational players are carried out in the circumstances of interaction with another party. One of the major critics of game theory is that players who behave irrationally might benefit more, thus the rationality itself directly hampers game theory (Hao et al, 2014;De Bruin, 2009;Kelly, 2003).…”
Section: Restrictions On the Application Of Game Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Game theory is based on the assumption of rationality, but there is a need for further experimental evidence to support the assumption that individuals choose to perform important strategies and complex decisions under an element of uncertainty driven by rationality (Pooyandeh & Marceau, 2014;De Bruin, 2009;Kelly, 2003).…”
Section: Restrictions On the Application Of Game Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation