Overnight calls in primary care: randomised controlled trial of management using nurse telephone consultation

Abstract

We recently published the results of a randomised controlled trial of a nurse telephone consultation service in primary care out of hours. 1 The new service, operating at evenings and weekends, significantly reduced general practitioners' workload and was at least as safe as the existing out of hours service. Contacts diminish sharply after about 10 pm, 2 and, anecdotally, a higher proportion of night calls necessitate consultation with a general practitioner. We report here a parallel trial aimed at establishing whether nurse telephone consultation was equally effective in managing workload at night. Subjects, methods, and resultsThis study was an adjunct to a randomised controlled trial in a 55 member general practice cooperative serving 97 000 patients in Wiltshire. The design has been described. 1 The night nurse telephone consultation service ran over two two-week periods (15-28 October 1997 and 12-25 November 1997) from 11.15 pm until 8 am. Outcome measures were as used in the main trial with one addition: the number of patients attending daytime surgery within three days of a call.1 One of us (FT) visited each surgery to extract details of attendances from patient records.In the main study 49.8% of calls were handled by the nurse alone. Specifying = 0.1 (0.05 in a one sided calculation) and = 0.2, we calculated that the night nurse service would need to receive 78 calls to establish equivalence with this figure, with equivalence limits being 40% and 60%.3 A one sided calculation was used as we were interested to establish only whether the night nurse intervention produced worse results (lower numbers of calls handled without referral to a doctor) than the evening and weekend service. For other within-trial outcomes, results are presented as relative risks with 95% confidence intervals, calculated with EpiInfo. This trial was not powered to show within-trial equivalence in numbers of adverse events.During the study 210 callers made 223 calls, 123 in the control group and 100 in the nurse telephone consultation (intervention) group. Follow up was 94% complete: 12 sets of patient records (6%) could not be found, seven in the control group and five in the intervention group. The median age (range) of patients was 34.0 ( 0.01-97.2) years in the control group and 32.5 (0.49-97.0) years in the intervention group. Fifty three patients (43%) in the control group and 44 (44%) in the intervention group were male.The table shows details of call management and outcome. Altogether 59% of calls (95% confidence interval 48.7% to 68.7%) were handled by the nurse alone. As we were interested only in whether the nurse service handled fewer calls at night, this can be interpreted as showing equivalence with the proportion observed in the main trial. The proportions of calls in which callers received advice from a general practitioner and calls ending in a home visit showed clear reductions, with 95% confidence intervals not embracing 1. A lower proportion of calls resulted in a daytime surgery attendance in the intervention ...

The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of telephone triage for managing same-day consultation requests in general practice: a cluster randomised controlled trial comparing general practitioner-led and nurse-led management systems with usual care (the ESTEEM trial)

“…70 Two RCTs comparing triage by GPs and nurses in out-of-hours primary care settings found no difference in hospital admissions. 5,15 Richards et al, 3 however, found an increase in A&E admissions following nurse telephone triage in general practice. 3 McKinstry et al 72 suggested that telephone consultations may be less likely to include sufficient information to exclude important serious illnesses and therefore were potentially more likely to compromise patient safety.…”

Nurse telephone triage for same day appointments in general practice: multiple interrupted time series trial of effect on workload and costs

“…Studies of the effect of triage on workload have been small and had a restricted focus (for example, calls in the morning only,3 out of hours,24 and home visit requests received before 10 30 am4). Triage has been reported to reduce general practitioners' same day activity by between 25% and 49%, 3 4 24 but only one small study examined use of services after triage.…”

What evidence is there on the effectiveness of different models of delivering urgent care? A rapid review

“…Seventeen studies reported impacts on their own service or other services, either from increased or reduced service use and or increased or reduced staff workload [68][69][70]86,95,98,99,[101][102][103]105,109,112,114,122,126,134 One study found that NHS Direct referred a higher proportion of patients to other services when compared with general practice. 134 A RCT by Lattimer et al 68 reported a 38% reduction in primary care appointments and a 23% reduction in home visits, whereas another study reported no change in primary care appointments but home visits reduced by 18%.…”