2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.japwor.2004.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overreaction effects independent of risk and characteristics: evidence from the Japanese stock market

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the long term, only the return for the holding period of 15 months is significant. For the Japanese stock market, Chiao and Hueng (2005) document significant contrarian returns. Moreover, the returns persist after controlling for the size effect.…”
Section: Long-term Contrarian Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the long term, only the return for the holding period of 15 months is significant. For the Japanese stock market, Chiao and Hueng (2005) document significant contrarian returns. Moreover, the returns persist after controlling for the size effect.…”
Section: Long-term Contrarian Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While studying the sources of an overreaction effect on the Japanese stock market, Chiao and Hueng (2005) show that the firm size (SZ) and the bookto-market ratio (BM) cannot fully explain stock returns on prior-return-based portfolios in Japan. They found that, after controlling for SZ and BM effects, the overreaction effect persists significant and plays an important role in explaining the zero-investment returns constructed by a contrarian strategy.…”
Section: Implications For Other Empirical Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1994; Elfakhani et al. 1998; Chiao and Hueng, 2005), there nevertheless exist a few exceptions. For example, Chui and Wei (1998) observe that BM fails to explain the cross‐sectional stock returns in Thailand and Taiwan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While empirical evidence of a positive BM-return relation has been globally documented (e.g. Chan et al 1991;Lakonishok et al 1994;Elfakhani et al 1998;Chiao and Hueng, 2005), there nevertheless exist a few exceptions. For example, Chui and Wei (1998) observe that BM fails to explain the cross-sectional stock returns in Thailand and Taiwan.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%