Overseas industrial parks and China's outward foreign direct investment

Shi, Buchao; Huang, Liangxiong; Wei, Shouke; Geng, Xinyue

doi:10.1016/j.asieco.2022.101545

Cited by 5 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 56 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The determinants of OFDI could be divided into macro-regional-level (further classified as host-country factors, home-country factors, and factors related to bilateral relationships) and micro-firm-level. Some widely recognized macro-regional-level factors include financing capacity, productivity, technological capability, enterprise scale, overseas investment experience, and communication costs, among others; micro-firm-level factors include market size, natural resource endowment, technology level, taxation, political and institutional conditions, among others (Shi et al, 2022). The determinants discussed in this paper will focus on the macro-regional host country factors.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Why We Should Not Wait for Existing Latvian Crowdfunding Platforms’ Authorisation under the EU Regulation on Crowdfunding Service Providers for Business

Adlere¹

2023

International Scientific Conference "New Challenges in Economic and Business Development – 2023: Recovery and Resilience" : Pro

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The past decade, the crowdfunding market was growing rapidly in the European Union, including Latvia. At the same time, crowdfunding had remained unregulated domain until the European Union Regulation on European crowdfunding service providers for business (henceforth - the Regulation) was passed in October, 2020, giving the Member States one year for its adoption, and additional one year for crowdfunding service providers for authorising under the Regulation. Nevertheless, by the end of 2022, there was only one licensed crowdfunding service provider managed by Latvian legal entity. Considering this, the goal of the study is to explore why the majority of existing crowdfunding platforms, managed by legal entities registered in Latvia, has not authorised itself under the Regulation. To achieve the goal, the methodology of the study combines in-depth analysis of the Regulation with an explanatory case study of crowdfunding platforms managed by Latvian legal entities. Having considered nine platforms managed by Latvian legal entities, the results of the study show that four biggest Latvian platforms have authorized themselves as investment firms. Among other platforms which are unlicensed for the time being, there could be only one potential candidate to extend the list of crowdfunding service providers authorised under the Regulation. The conclusion was made considering the business models of the providers, and presence or absence of an auto-investing function, which was restricted by the Regulation. An implication of the obtained results is the possibility that the research will serve as a base for future studies on the Regulation’s effect on the European crowdfunding industry.

show abstract

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%