2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2013.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Oversizing analysis in plant-wide control design for industrial processes

Abstract: In this work, an alternative plant-wide control design approach based on oversizing analysis is presented.The overall strategy can be divided in two main sequential tasks: 1-defining the optimal decentralized control structure, and 2-setting the controller interaction degree and its implementation. Both problems represent combinatorial optimizations based on multi-objective functional costs and were solved efficiently by genetic algorithms. The first task defines the optimal selection of controlled and manipul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
52
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking into account this variable, the new strategy NC 5 (4 × 4) presents excellent performance when compared against NC 2 (5 × 5): EIP(xme(19)) = 333.02% for idv(1)−idv(4) (scenario 5) and EIP(xme(19)) = 350.41% for idv(8)−idv(12) (scenario 6). (17) xmv(3)−xme (7) xmv(3)−xme (7) xmv(4)−xme (17) xmv(3)−xme(7) xmv(6)−xme (7) xmv(4)−xme (17) xmv(4)−xme (17) xmv(6)−xme (7) xmv(4)−xme(17) xmv(9)−xme (18) xmv (6) Even though NC 2 increases the dimension of the structure, it does not propose a noticeable improvement of the dynamics with respect to NC 5 . This is reflected by the small EIP values of Tables 7, 9, and 10.…”
Section: Application Case: Tennessee Eastmanmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Taking into account this variable, the new strategy NC 5 (4 × 4) presents excellent performance when compared against NC 2 (5 × 5): EIP(xme(19)) = 333.02% for idv(1)−idv(4) (scenario 5) and EIP(xme(19)) = 350.41% for idv(8)−idv(12) (scenario 6). (17) xmv(3)−xme (7) xmv(3)−xme (7) xmv(4)−xme (17) xmv(3)−xme(7) xmv(6)−xme (7) xmv(4)−xme (17) xmv(4)−xme (17) xmv(6)−xme (7) xmv(4)−xme(17) xmv(9)−xme (18) xmv (6) Even though NC 2 increases the dimension of the structure, it does not propose a noticeable improvement of the dynamics with respect to NC 5 . This is reflected by the small EIP values of Tables 7, 9, and 10.…”
Section: Application Case: Tennessee Eastmanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following a similar procedure, Zumoffen 18 and Molina et al 19 estimated the normalized steady-state gain matrices G (inputs − outputs) and D (disturbances − outputs). These matrices are utilized in this work for supporting the controller design stage.…”
Section: Application Case: Tennessee Eastmanmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The classical centralized or decentralized control structures are not always the best solution for the multivariable plant‐wide control problem . A systematic and a generalized multivariable plant‐wide control strategy have been proposed . The overall strategy is based on a single multi‐objective combinatorial optimization problem with steady‐state functional costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%