Overt Transference

McCartney, James L.

doi:10.1080/00224499.1966.10749568

Cited by 49 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The analytical approach's improvident insistence on emotional aloofness has certainly been at the expense of the patient's immediate and sometimes lifesaving need for comfort. This hardly needs to be carried to the absurd excesses advocated by McCartney (1966), Shepard (1971) and others; a stone from the therapist's pocket will do (see Hobson 1985).…”

Section: Conventional Treatment Approaches With Narcissistic Disturbancementioning

confidence: 98%

Treatment of Early Narcissistic Disturbance

Corney

1988

Brit J Psychotherapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Conventional Treatment Approaches With Narcissistic Disturbancementioning

confidence: 98%

Treatment of Early Narcissistic Disturbance

Corney

1988

Brit J Psychotherapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…McCartney [28], Shepherd [29] and other writers in the early 1970s atttempted to show that sexual contact between doctor and patient could benefit the patient. Subsequent research [2 1,27,30-33 J does not support this view.…”

Section: Evidence Of Harmful Effects On Patientsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Origins and Development of the Injunction Prohibiting Sexual Relationships with Patients

Leggett¹

1995

Aust N Z J Psychiatry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper addresses the historical context, both ancient and modern, of the injunction prohibiting sexual relationships with patients. Reference is made to the increasing knowledge of factors predisposing to such breaches of ethical conduct and to the common dangers and consequences of sexual relationships with patients. Such research findings demonstrate adequate cause for the application of the injunction in all of the health care professions. The modern social context of liberal humanism and feminism, along with the recognised analogy with child sexual abuse, are considered as influences in the current resurgence of interest in the injunction itself.

show abstract

“…Because of the intimate nature of the doctor-patient relationship, a wide range of emotions, including sexual feelings, are evoked and there is a potential for overt sexualisation of the interaction (Gabbard, 1989). The incidence of sexual contact between doctors and patients is difficult to document, but those studies that have been done, coupled with recurring ethics complaints and lawsuits, suggest that it is not an infrequent occurrence (McCartney, 1966;Shepard, 1971;Kardener, 1974;Perry, 1976;Holroyd & Brodsky, 1977;Romeo, 1978;Gartrell et ai, 1986;Derosis et ai, 1987;Rapp, 1987).…”

Section: Doctor-patient Sexual Interactionmentioning

confidence: 99%