2012
DOI: 10.1258/ar.2012.110552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overtime reliability of medial temporal lobe atrophy rating in a clinical setting

Abstract: Visual assessment of MTA repeated over time has a high grade of reproducibility when performed by an experienced investigator. The reproducibility drops when assessment is rarely performed. Inter-rater reliability is low when two investigators not working together are compared.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
1
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
22
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Good interrater agreement has previously been demonstrated for L.C. in comparison with a second rater [25,33], manual tracings from another experienced radiologist [30], and multivariate classification from automated morphometric methods [29]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Good interrater agreement has previously been demonstrated for L.C. in comparison with a second rater [25,33], manual tracings from another experienced radiologist [30], and multivariate classification from automated morphometric methods [29]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since it was introduced, the Scheltens scale has been included in over 100 studies with several reporting improved sensitivity, specificity and reliability over the original study, even when used in a clinical setting 27. The reliability of the scale has been reported to be robust to the clinical experience of the rater28 but increases as the rater gains more experience with the scale itself 29. Improved performance of the scale may be due to advances in image acquisition and display, such as improved scanner hardware, higher field strengths (the original study was performed at 0.5 T and 0.6 T) and reporting of the images from digital display over hard copy film images.…”
Section: Visual Rating Of the Mtlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, Scheltens' coronal plane was obtained parallel to the brain stem axis from a midsagittal scout image with a slice thickness of 5 mm and an interslice gap of 1 mm on 0.5 or 0.6T MRI (29), which is different from the current MR acquisition technique to some extent. Recent studies employing the Scheltens 5-point scale with a modified oblique coronal plane perpendicular to the anterior-posterior commissure line with slice thicknesses between 0.8–4 mm have shown more promising results and better inter-observer reliability (weighed κ = 0.65–0.84) (2333). …”
Section: Structural Imagingmentioning
confidence: 99%