1st Flow Control Conference 2002
DOI: 10.2514/6.2002-3159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of Active Flow Control Actuator Development at NASA Langley Research Center

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…8 and shows the development of two vortices at the vicinity of the slot and the existence of a lowest saddle point that defines the near-wake and the far-wake flow region. The same flow topology has already been shown by Smith et al Smith and Glezer (2002) and Schaffler et al Schaffler et al (2002). In the synthetic jet flow, we can identify a near-field and a farfield regions delimited by the red line in Fig.…”
Section: Spatial Behavior Of the Induced Flowsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…8 and shows the development of two vortices at the vicinity of the slot and the existence of a lowest saddle point that defines the near-wake and the far-wake flow region. The same flow topology has already been shown by Smith et al Smith and Glezer (2002) and Schaffler et al Schaffler et al (2002). In the synthetic jet flow, we can identify a near-field and a farfield regions delimited by the red line in Fig.…”
Section: Spatial Behavior Of the Induced Flowsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Alternating suction-blowing mechanism or synthetic jet are efficient methods for control because they improve the aerodynamic performances. Several synthetic jet actuators are designed, they can be grouped into three categories: the piezoelectric devices (Smith and Glezer (2002), Schaffler et al (2002)), mechanical devices (Rediniotis et al (1999), Crittenden and Glezer (2006) , Joseph et al (2013)) and the acoustic devices (Erk (1997) , McCormick (2000 , Tesar and Kordik (2010) ). A constraint of the piezoelectric actuators is that the output velocity depends on the resonance frequency contrary to the mechanical actuators where the expulsion speed increases linearly with the frequency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonlinear bimorphs may also be useful on smaller scales, including micro-fluidic controls and nanoscale electrical switches. 44,45 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 For cavity flow control, the requirement for low-frequency forcing devices is a bandwidth that includes the Rossiter frequencies of interest. 27 Candidate lowfrequency actuators include piezoelectric flaps with deflections on the order of the viscous sublayer of the boundary layer approaching the cavity, 1,20 steady and pulsating blowing jets, 29 successfully demonstrated cavity tone suppression across a broad range of frequencies without exciting additional tones at supersonic speeds by using a powered resonance tube, a high-frequency fluidic device whose frequency is an order of magnitude greater than the Rossiter modes (see Refs. [30][31][32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%