2003
DOI: 10.1109/map.2003.1282192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Overview of an image-based technique for predicting far-field radar cross section from near-field measurements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion is in accordance with the fact, that a rigorous transformation from near field backscattering data into far field data requires an elaborate full set of bistatic measurements to be performed [2]. However, under certain conditions and for the purpose of certain applications the deviation between the RDs for the measurement space and the operational parameter space can be neglected, leading to the approximate assumption of an "universal reflectivity distribution".…”
Section: Measurement Space and Operational Parameter Space Rd-approxsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This conclusion is in accordance with the fact, that a rigorous transformation from near field backscattering data into far field data requires an elaborate full set of bistatic measurements to be performed [2]. However, under certain conditions and for the purpose of certain applications the deviation between the RDs for the measurement space and the operational parameter space can be neglected, leading to the approximate assumption of an "universal reflectivity distribution".…”
Section: Measurement Space and Operational Parameter Space Rd-approxsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Backscattering measurements with rotated turntable, but fixed antenna position lead to the well-known 2-D inverse synthetic aperture radar (ISAR) imaging (see e.g. [1,2] for 2-D-imaging in far-and near field). Since two-dimensional projections of three-dimensional scattering center distributions are in case of complex targets (as e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One is the traditional SAR processing [13][14][15]: the SAR image at every frequency is formed using the scattered field information. To combine the SAR images at every frequency, each one is multiplied by the conjugate of the incident field of the array (which also changes with frequency), then all the contributions are added [2,23].…”
Section: Description Of the Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, an outside test field site or a compact range system is very expensive. In order to overcome this problem, a variety of near-field test method to extrapolate RCS came into being [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. In this overview, two categories are summed up from the existing extrapolating techniques, the one is based on Huygens Equivalent Reradiating Source (HERS), and the other is based on inverse synthetic aperture imaging (ISAI).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the extrapolation of far field RCS from near field data requires a full set of bistatic scattering measurements. La Haie developed a new near field-to-far field transformations (NFFFT) for predicting the far-field RCS of targets from monostatic nearfield measurements [5,6]. His techniques use approximations and/or supporting information to overcome the need for bistatic near-field measurement [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%